| Literature DB >> 28333505 |
Nadia M Brashier1, Sharda Umanath2, Roberto Cabeza1, Elizabeth J Marsh1.
Abstract
Consumers regularly encounter repeated false claims in political and marketing campaigns, but very little empirical work addresses their impact among older adults. Repeated statements feel easier to process, and thus more truthful, than new ones (i.e., illusory truth). When judging truth, older adults' accumulated general knowledge may offset this perception of fluency. In two experiments, participants read statements that contradicted information stored in memory; a post-experimental knowledge check confirmed what individual participants knew. Unlike young adults, older adults exhibited illusory truth only when they lacked knowledge about claims. This interaction between knowledge and fluency extends dual-process theories of aging. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28333505 PMCID: PMC5476227 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000156
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Aging ISSN: 0882-7974