Literature DB >> 8949325

The reported availability of general practitioners and the influence of practice list size.

J L Campbell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined practice list sizes have increased, but larger practice size may be associated with disadvantage to patients. AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the availability of general practitioners as reported by their patients and the relationship between reported availability and practice list size.
METHOD: A one-week questionnaire survey of 8315 patients attending participating practices in West Lothian, Scotland, was conducted. Patients were asked about the arrangements for being seen at that attendance, their perception of doctor availability following an urgent or non-urgent consultation request, and their social and demographic characteristics. The proportion of respondents reporting they could see a doctor the same day following an urgent consultation request or within 2 days following a non-urgent consultation request was determined for each practice.
RESULTS: Eighteen out of 26 practices agreed to participate in the study, and an overall response rate of 61% was obtained in the patient survey. Participating practices were representative of all practices in the area with regard to list size; questionnaire respondents were representative of the age profile of participating practices and were representative of the local general population with regard to car and home ownership. There was a wide variation among practices in the proportion of questionnaire respondents who reported that a doctor was available within 2 days following a non-urgent consultation request [mean 60.7 (SE 7.1%)], but less variation for the reported availability on the same day after an urgent consultation request [mean 81.1 (SE 2.3 %)]. A significant negative association was demonstrated between combined practice list size and reported non-urgent or urgent availability.
CONCLUSION: Wide variation exists between practices with regard to patients' perceptions of doctor availability, and smaller practices may have advantages in this regard. The feelings and perceptions of patients should be taken into account when planning or reviewing the delivery of primary health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8949325      PMCID: PMC1239716     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  6 in total

1.  List size, composition of practice and general practitioners' workload in The Netherlands.

Authors:  P P Groenewegen; J B Hutten; K van der Velden
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  GPs, patients, and the distance between them.

Authors:  J Robson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-14

3.  What type of general practice do patients prefer? Exploration of practice characteristics influencing patient satisfaction.

Authors:  R Baker; J Streatfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  General practitioner appointment systems, patient satisfaction, and use of accident and emergency services--a study in one geographical area.

Authors:  J L Campbell
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Is personal continuity of care compatible with free choice of doctor? Patients' views on seeing the same doctor.

Authors:  G K Freeman; S C Richards
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Survey of services to patients in general practice.

Authors:  N Bradley; R Gude
Journal:  West Engl Med J       Date:  1992-03
  6 in total
  13 in total

1.  Measuring concentration in primary care.

Authors:  D K Whynes; P Thornton
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2000-01

2.  Pragmatic model of patient satisfaction in general practice: progress towards a theory.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-12

3.  How do general practices manage requests from patients for 'same-day' appointments? A questionnaire survey.

Authors:  M Luthra; M N Marshall
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Primary care: core values. Patients' priorities.

Authors:  J Neuberger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-25

5.  Will the future GP remain a personal doctor?

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Accessibility and availability: how can we cope?

Authors:  P J Davis
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Do single handed practices offer poorer care? Cross sectional survey of processes and outcomes.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; M Pringle; C Coupland; V Hammersley; A Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-11

8.  Practice size: impact on consultation length, workload, and patient assessment of care.

Authors:  J L Campbell; J Ramsay; J Green
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  J G Howie; D J Heaney; M Maxwell; J J Walker; G K Freeman; H Rai
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

10.  Catchment areas in general practice and their relation to size and quality of practice and deprivation: a descriptive study in one London borough.

Authors:  C Jenkins; J Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.