Literature DB >> 8745863

What type of general practice do patients prefer? Exploration of practice characteristics influencing patient satisfaction.

R Baker1, J Streatfield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General practice is currently experiencing a large number of developments. Studies of patient satisfaction are required to guide the changes that many general practitioners are introducing. AIM: A study set out to examine the characteristics of general practices that influence patient satisfaction.
METHOD: In 1991-92, a surgery satisfaction questionnaire of demonstrated reliability and validity was administered to 220 patients in each of 89 general practices. A further questionnaire completed by a member of practice staff collected information about practice characteristics including total list size, number, age and sex of practice partners, training status, fundholding status, presence of a practice manager and whether there was a personal list system. Stepwise multiple regression analyses were undertaken to identify those practice characteristics that influenced patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: The mean of the response rates of patients completing questionnaires in each practice was 82%. An increasing total list size of patients registered with practices was associated with decreasing levels of general satisfaction and decreased satisfaction with accessibility, availability, continuity of care, medical care and premises. The presence of a personal list system was associated with increased levels of general satisfaction and increased satisfaction with accessibility, availability, continuity of care and medical care. Training practices were associated with decreased levels of general satisfaction and decreased satisfaction with availability and continuity of care.
CONCLUSION: The patients of practices in this study preferred smaller practices, non-training practices and practices that had personal list systems. Practice organization should be reviewed in order to ensure that the trend towards larger practices that provide a wider range of services does not lead to a decline in patient satisfaction. General practitioners should have personal list systems and consider the creation of several personal teams within the practice consisting of small numbers of doctors, receptionists and practice nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8745863      PMCID: PMC1239467     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  14 in total

1.  Public opinion, the NHS, and the media: changing patterns and perspectives.

Authors:  K Judge; M Solomon; D Miller; G Philo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-04

2.  General practice in Gloucestershire, Avon and Somerset: explaining variations in standards.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  The measurement of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  R A Carr-Hill
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1992-09

4.  Quality management in the NHS: the doctor's role--I.

Authors:  D M Berwick; A Enthoven; J P Bunker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-25

5.  Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-13

6.  The "five minute" consultation: effect of time constraint on clinical content and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  D C Morrell; M E Evans; R W Morris; M O Roland
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-29

7.  Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Hall; M C Dornan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  P Hjortdahl; E Laerum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-16

9.  Key determinants of consumer satisfaction with general practice.

Authors:  S J Williams; M Calnan
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  Patient's assessment of out of hours care in general practice.

Authors:  M J Bollam; M McCarthy; M Modell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-03-19
View more
  58 in total

1.  Assessment of management in general practice: validation of a practice visit method.

Authors:  P van den Hombergh; R Grol; H J van den Hoogen; W J van den Bosch
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Does continuity in general practice really matter?

Authors:  B Guthrie; S Wyke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

3.  Measuring concentration in primary care.

Authors:  D K Whynes; P Thornton
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2000-01

4.  Pragmatic model of patient satisfaction in general practice: progress towards a theory.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-12

Review 5.  The relationship between consultation length, process and outcomes in general practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Wilson; Susan Childs
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Walk-in centres in primary care: a review of the international literature.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; James Munro
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  The new contract: renaissance or requiem for general practice?

Authors:  Martin Marshall; Martin Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Do the Quality and Outcomes Framework patient experience indicators reward practices that offer improved access?

Authors:  Richard Baker; M John Bankart; Ged M Murtagh
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Single-handed or group practice, quality of care and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Rob Atenstaedt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  A method for measuring continuity of care in day-to-day general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment data.

Authors:  Kate Sidaway-Lee; Denis Pereira Gray; Philip Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.