Literature DB >> 8312019

Is personal continuity of care compatible with free choice of doctor? Patients' views on seeing the same doctor.

G K Freeman1, S C Richards.   

Abstract

While much has been written about the benefits of personal continuity of care there has been little research about the views of patients. In this cross sectional study 111 patients from three group practices (one of which ran a personal list system) were interviewed at home within a week of consulting a general practitioner. Patients were selected randomly from a systematic series of consulting sessions and a semi-structured interview was administered. Patients receiving more personal continuity of care were likely to be older, to have booked their most recent appointment further in advance, to desire personal continuity of care, to have an external health locus of control and to have a lower extroversion score. In the practice with a personal list, patients had a high level of continuity of care, were satisfied and showed little interest in having a choice of doctor. In the combined list practices patients valued their choice of doctor but often could not exercise it enough and they were more critical. They made more suggestions for change than those in the practice with a personal list system, mostly about receptionists and appointments. It is concluded that most patients like to see the same doctor, but they may not be willing to wait two days for this if there is a quicker option. It may be difficult to deliver both personal continuity of care and choice in group practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8312019      PMCID: PMC1372612     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  11 in total

1.  The personal doctor and his relation to the hospital. Observations and reflections on some American experiments in general practice by groups.

Authors:  T F FOX
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1960-04-02       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Continuity of medical care: conceptualization and measurement.

Authors:  S M Shortell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The key to personal care.

Authors:  D J Gray
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1979-11

4.  Changes in general practice: do patients benefit?

Authors:  S Arber; L Sawyer
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-11-21

Review 5.  Does continuous care from a physician make a difference?

Authors:  A J Dietrich; K I Marton
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  How much personal care in four group practices?

Authors:  G K Freeman; S C Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-11-03

7.  Comparison of criteria derived by government and patients for evaluating general practitioner services.

Authors:  C H Smith; D Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-19

8.  Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  P Hjortdahl; E Laerum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-16

9.  Why patients consult and what happens when they do.

Authors:  E Martin; D Russell; S Goodwin; R Chapman; M North; P Sheridan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-03

10.  Effect of a principal's gender on consultation patterns.

Authors:  M E Preston-Whyte; R C Fraser; J L Beckett
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1983-10
View more
  18 in total

1.  Measuring concentration in primary care.

Authors:  D K Whynes; P Thornton
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  Walk-in centres in primary care: a review of the international literature.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; James Munro
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Exploring factors associated with patients' satisfaction with medication change: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Sarah Rodgers; Anthony J Avery; Ciaran O'Neill
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The future for personal doctoring.

Authors:  Jeannie Haggerty
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Will the future GP remain a personal doctor?

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Continuity of Care: Literature review and implications.

Authors:  Mohammed Alazri; Philip Heywood; Richard D Neal; Brenda Leese
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2007-12

7.  Balancing proactive and reactive care.

Authors:  J C Gillies; A G Baird; E M Gillies
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1995-09

8.  What type of general practice do patients prefer? Exploration of practice characteristics influencing patient satisfaction.

Authors:  R Baker; J Streatfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Preference for a general practitioner and patients' evaluations of care: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Henk Schers; Henk van den Hoogen; Hans Bor; Richard Grol; Wil van den Bosch
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Physician assistants and nurse practitioners as a usual source of care.

Authors:  Christine M Everett; Jessica R Schumacher; Alexandra Wright; Maureen A Smith
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.