Literature DB >> 8946544

Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms.

U Bick1, M L Giger, R A Schmidt, R M Nishikawa, K Doi.   

Abstract

When digital mammograms are viewed on video displays, evaluation of the skin and subcutaneous tissue is often difficult and may require special window settings. An algorithm has been developed for selective enhancement (ie, density correction) of the dark peripheral portions of the breast on mammograms. After an automated segmentation of the digital mammogram and identification of the skin line, a fitted enhancement curve is generated to selectively enhance all pixels within a certain distance from the skin to match the density of the center part of the breast. After enhancement, skin and breast parenchyma can be evaluated simultaneously without the need for different window settings. When tested on a set of 400 digitized mammograms, the density correction algorithm significantly (P < .0001) increased the maximum area of breast tissue visualized simultaneously at window width settings of 0.5-2.0 delta OD (optical density). Artifacts interfering with interpretation were observed in less than 1%. The algorithm for correcting the density of peripheral breast tissue substantially facilitates and improves the display of digital mammograms and thus will be a valuable component of an integrated workstation for computer-aided diagnosis in mammography.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8946544     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.16.6.8946544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  9 in total

1.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; D Albagli; S Han; E J Tkaczyk; C E Landberg; B Opsahl-Ong; P R Granfors; I Levis; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Breast imaging using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital mammographic system: stability of a clinical prototype.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Model-based technique for the measurement of skin thickness in mammography.

Authors:  A Katartzis; H Sahli; J Cornelis; S Fotopoulos; G Panayiotakis
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; I Levis; M Sayag; R Kleehammer; R Heidsieck; C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Identification of the breast boundary in mammograms using active contour models.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; J E L Desautels; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Segmentation of the fibro-glandular disc in mammograms using Gaussian mixture modelling.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know?

Authors:  Ulrich Bick; Felix Diekmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Robert M Nishikawa; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Constantine Gatsonis; Etta D Pisano; Elodia B Cole; Helga S Marques; Carl J D'Orsi; Dione M Farria; Kalpana M Kanal; Mary C Mahoney; Murray Rebner; Melinda J Staiger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Image analysis in medical imaging: recent advances in selected examples.

Authors:  G Dougherty
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2010-07-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.