Literature DB >> 7468878

Prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in an HMO and general population: a multivariate cohort analysis.

J D Quick, M R Greenlick, K J Roghmann.   

Abstract

We studied the use of prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in 4,148 deliveries among members of a well-established health maintenance organization (HMO) and 19,116 births among the 1973-1974 White birth cohort in the Portland, Oregon area. Mothers in the HMO were almost one year older on the average, slightly better educated, and less frequently unmarried, but had virtually identical past pregnancy histories when compared with the general population cohort. HMO members began prenatal care one month later and had three fewer visits than the general population (p less than .01); 78 per cent of the general population and only 64 per cent of HMO members began prenatal care in the first trimester (p less than .01). With maternal risk held constant, low birthweight, neonatal mortality, and infant mortality were 1.5 to 5 times greater with late, less frequent prenatal care than with early, frequent care. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a positive relationship between prenatal care and birthweight. Although this relationship was independent of risk factors recorded on birth certificates, it is not necessarily a causal relationship. Unadjusted prematurity, neonatal and infant mortality rates did not differ between the HMO and general populations. Multivariate analyses indicated that, independent of all maternal risk factors, HMO membership was associated with an increase of 30 grams in the predicted birthweight (P less than .01), but had no effect on mortality. The data suggest that, in Portland, Oregon, pregnancy outcome for HMO members is comparable to that of the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7468878      PMCID: PMC1619678          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.71.4.381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  30 in total

1.  Prenatal and intrapartum high-risk screening. I. Prediction of the high-rish neonate.

Authors:  C J Hobel; M A Hyvarinen; D M Okada; W Oh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Effects of maternal nutrition on the human fetus.

Authors:  R L Naeye; W Blanc; C Paul
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Low birth weight and prenatal nutrition: an interpretative review.

Authors:  L Bergner; M W Susser
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Determinants of medical care utilization: the role of the telephone in total medical care.

Authors:  M R Greenlick; D K Freeborn; G L Gambill; C R Pope
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1973 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Health policy and the HMO.

Authors:  E W Saward; M R Greenlick
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1972-04

6.  High-risk obstetrics. VI. An evaluation of the effects of intensified care on pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  F V DeGeorge; R E Nesbitt; R H Aubry
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Reducing neonatal mortality rate with nurse-midwives.

Authors:  B S Levy; F S Wilkinson; W M Marine
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-01-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Health maintenance strategy.

Authors:  P M Ellwood; N N Anderson; J E Billings; R J Carlson; E J Hoagberg; W McClure
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1971 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Effects of some factors on neonatal and postneonatal mortality. Analysis by a binary variable multiple regression method.

Authors:  F K Shah; H Abbey
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1971-01

10.  Racial differences between linked birth and infant death records in Washington State.

Authors:  F Frost; K K Shy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  29 in total

1.  Prenatal care use among selected Asian American groups.

Authors:  S M Yu; G R Alexander; R Schwalberg; M D Kogan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Delayed prenatal care and the risk of low birth weight delivery.

Authors:  William J Hueston; Gregory E Gilbert; Lucy Davis; Vanessa Sturgill
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-06

3.  Integrating the life course perspective into a local maternal and child health program.

Authors:  Cheri Pies; Padmini Parthasarathy; Samuel F Posner
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

4.  Analyzing the effect of prenatal care on pregnancy outcome: a conditional approach.

Authors:  M H Malloy; T C Kao; Y J Lee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Impact of the HealthChoice program on cesarean section and vaginal birth after C-section deliveries: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Arpit Misra
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-06-05

6.  Medicaid prenatal care: a comparison of use and outcomes in fee-for-service and managed care.

Authors:  J W Krieger; F A Connell; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Interpretative views on Hispanics' perinatal problems of low birth weight and prenatal care.

Authors:  H Balcazar; C Aoyama; X Cai
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 9.  HMO data systems in population studies of access to care.

Authors:  R Fink
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  A comparison of capitated and fee-for-service Medicaid reimbursement methods on pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  D M Oleske; M L Branca; J B Schmidt; R Ferguson; E S Linn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.