Literature DB >> 23151857

Psychomotor development of children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis and parental stress evaluation.

Loretta Thomaidis1, Sophia Kitsiou-Tzeli, Elena Critselis, Hera Drandakis, Vassiliki Touliatou, Stelios Mantoudis, Eleni Leze, Aspasia Destouni, Joanne Traeger-Synodinos, Dimitrios Kafetzis, Emmanouel Kanavakis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increasing number of children conceived following preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) necessitates the evaluation of their motor and cognitive development. The primary study objective was to evaluate the physical, developmental, and neurological outcome of children born after PGD in Greece. In addition, the secondary study objective was to compare the stress levels regarding parental roles between parents of PGD children and those of naturally conceived children.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was applied. The study population consisted of 31 children (aged 2 months to 7.5 years) born after PGD analysis and their parents. The developmental evaluation of children included a detailed physical evaluation and cognitive assessment with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. The parent stress index was applied to evaluate comparative parental stress levels between those parents of PGD children and those of naturally conceived healthy children.
RESULTS: High rates of caesarean deliveries, increased incidence of prematurity, multiples and low-birth weight were observed among the 31 PGD children. Overall, 24 of the 31 PGD children had cognitive skills within normal range [general developmental quotient (GDQ): 86-115], while 6 children had lower levels of cognitive skills (GDQ<85). With regard to parental stress, PGD parents reported lower levels of parenting stress as compared to parents of naturally conceived children (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced frequency of poor cognitive and motor skills as well as low parental stress necessitates early detection and intervention for developmental delays among PGD children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23151857     DOI: 10.1007/s12519-012-0374-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Pediatr            Impact factor:   2.764


  40 in total

Review 1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Karen Sermon; André Van Steirteghem; Inge Liebaers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Panel reviews health effects data for assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Tracy Hampton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection IV: May-December 2001.

Authors:  K Sermon; C Moutou; J Harper; J Geraedts; P Scriven; L Wilton; M C Magli; A Michiels; S Viville; C De Die
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VI: cycles from January to December 2003 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2004.

Authors:  K D Sermon; A Michiels; G Harton; C Moutou; S Repping; P N Scriven; S SenGupta; J Traeger-Synodinos; K Vesela; S Viville; L Wilton; J C Harper
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Follow-up of children born after assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Michael Ludwig; Klaus Diedrich
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  ESHRE PGD Consortium 'Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)'.

Authors:  A R Thornhill; C E deDie-Smulders; J P Geraedts; J C Harper; G L Harton; S A Lavery; C Moutou; M D Robinson; A G Schmutzler; P N Scriven; K D Sermon; L Wilton
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  The European study of assisted reproduction families: family functioning and child development.

Authors:  S Golombok; A Brewaeys; R Cook; M T Giavazzi; D Guerra; A Mantovani; E van Hall; P G Crosignani; S Dexeus
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Developmental outcome at 2 years of age for children born after ICSI compared with children born after IVF.

Authors:  M Bonduelle; I Ponjaert; A Van Steirteghem; M-P Derde; P Devroey; I Liebaers
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Report on a consecutive series of 581 children born after blastomere biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  I Liebaers; S Desmyttere; W Verpoest; M De Rycke; C Staessen; K Sermon; P Devroey; P Haentjens; M Bonduelle
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Socio-emotional and language development of 2-year-old children born after PGD/PGS, and parental well-being.

Authors:  Julie Nekkebroeck; Maryse Bonduelle; Sonja Desmyttere; Wim Van den Broeck; Ingrid Ponjaert-Kristoffersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  3 in total

1.  Issues concerning psychomotor development of children after preimplanntation genetic diagnosis and parental stress evaluation.

Authors:  Jian Shen; Shu-Jiong Mao
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.764

2.  Pregnancy and child developmental outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening: a meta-analytic and systematic review.

Authors:  Misaki N Natsuaki; Laura M Dimler
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.764

3.  The results of pregnancies after gender selection by pre implantation genetic diagnosis and its relation with couple's age.

Authors:  Sorayya Panahi; Fariba Fahami
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.