Literature DB >> 26481576

Imaging and evaluation of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Marc A Bjurlin1, Andrew B Rosenkrantz2, Luis S Beltran2, Roy A Raad2, Samir S Taneja1.   

Abstract

Approximately 15% of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer have high-risk disease. Imaging is critically important for the diagnosis and staging of these patients, and also for the selection of management. While established prostate cancer staging guidelines have increased the appropriate use of imaging, underuse for high-risk prostate cancer remains substantial. Several factors affect the utility of initial diagnostic imaging, including the variable definition of high-risk prostate cancer, variable guideline recommendations, poor accuracy of existing imaging tests, and the difficulty in validating imaging findings. Conventional imaging modalities, including CT and radionuclide bone scan, have been employed for local and metastatic staging, but their performance characteristics have generally been poor. Emerging modalities including multiparametricMRI, positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, and PET-MRI have shown increased diagnostic accuracy and could improve accuracy in staging patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26481576     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  126 in total

1.  2-(3-{1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid, [18F]DCFPyL, a PSMA-based PET imaging agent for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Mrudula Pullambhatla; Catherine A Foss; Youngjoo Byun; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Srinivasan Senthamizhchelvan; George Sgouros; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Amyloidosis of the seminal vesicles simulating tumor invasion of prostatic carcinoma on endorectal MR images.

Authors:  G J Jager; E T Ruijter; J J de la Rosette; C A van de Kaa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Leon Mullenders; Mike Atkinson; Herwig Paretzke; Laure Sabatier; Simon Bouffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Sensitivity of frozen section examination of pelvic lymph nodes for metastatic prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  G L Davis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Challenges and recommendations for early identification of metastatic disease in prostate cancer.

Authors:  E David Crawford; Nelson N Stone; Evan Y Yu; Phillip J Koo; Stephen J Freedland; Susan F Slovin; Leonard G Gomella; E Roy Berger; Thomas E Keane; Paul Sieber; Neal D Shore; Daniel P Petrylak
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Prostate cancer: utility of diffusion-weighted imaging as a marker of side-specific risk of extracapsular extension.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Hersh Chandarana; Anthony Gilet; Fang-Ming Deng; James S Babb; Jonathan Melamed; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  The population level prevalence and correlates of appropriate and inappropriate imaging to stage incident prostate cancer in the medicare population.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Rani A Desai; James B Yu; Richa Sharma; Nitya Abraham; Peter C Albertsen; David F Penson; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Fluoride kinetics of the axial skeleton measured in vivo with fluorine-18-fluoride PET.

Authors:  C Schiepers; J Nuyts; G Bormans; J Dequeker; R Bouillon; L Mortelmans; A Verbruggen; M De Roo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Friedrich Fitz; Michael Nader; Wolfgang Loidl; Gabriele Broinger; Franz Stoiber; Ignac Foglman; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Whole-body PET/CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk.

Authors:  Bingsheng Huang; Martin Wai-Ming Law; Pek-Lan Khong
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  12 in total

1.  A urologist's perspective on prostate cancer imaging: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Arvin K George; Baris Turkbey; Subin G Valayil; Akhil Muthigi; Francesca Mertan; Michael Kongnyuy; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

Review 2.  Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer: Does it really make sense?

Authors:  Romain Mathieu; Stephan M Korn; Karim Bensalah; Gero Kramer; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  18F Fluorocholine Dynamic Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Initial Clinical-Pathologic Comparisons.

Authors:  Joon Young Choi; Jaewon Yang; Susan M Noworolski; Spencer Behr; Albert J Chang; Jeffry P Simko; Hao G Nguyen; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT: a promising new technique for predicting risk stratification and metastatic risk of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Chen Liu; Teli Liu; Ning Zhang; Yiqiang Liu; Nan Li; Peng Du; Yong Yang; Ming Liu; Kan Gong; Xing Yang; Hua Zhu; Kun Yan; Zhi Yang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Improvement of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis by Detecting PSA Glycosylation-Specific Changes.

Authors:  Esther Llop; Montserrat Ferrer-Batallé; Sílvia Barrabés; Pedro Enrique Guerrero; Manel Ramírez; Radka Saldova; Pauline M Rudd; Rosa N Aleixandre; Josep Comet; Rafael de Llorens; Rosa Peracaula
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 11.556

6.  Disparities in staging prostate magnetic resonance imaging utilization for nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ayobami Ajayi; Wei-Ting Hwang; Neha Vapiwala; Mark Rosen; Christina H Chapman; Stefan Both; Meera Shah; Xingmei Wang; Atu Agawu; Peter Gabriel; John Christodouleas; Zelig Tochner; Curtiland Deville
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-07-25

7.  Combined analysis of CRMP4 methylation levels and CAPRA-S score predicts metastasis and outcomes in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Qun-Xiong Huang; Chu-Tian Xiao; Zheng Chen; Min-Hua Lu; Jun Pang; Jin-Ming Di; Zi-Huan Luo; Xin Gao
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Evaluation of sHLA-G levels in serum of patients with prostate cancer identify as a potential of tumor marker.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassan Heidari; Abolfazl Movafagh; Mohammad-Amin Abdollahifar; Shabnam Abdi; Mohamadreza Mashhoudi Barez; Hadi Azimi; Afshin Moradi; Amin Bagheri; Matineh Heidari; Jafar Hessam Mohseni; Maryam Tadayon; Hoda Mirsafian; Mahdi Ghatrehsamani
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-03-29

Review 9.  Molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kristine M Wadosky; Shahriar Koochekpour
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-27

10.  Transcription Factor HBP1 Enhances Radiosensitivity by Inducing Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Yicheng Chen; Yueping Wang; Yanlan Yu; Liwei Xu; Youyun Zhang; Shicheng Yu; Gonghui Li; Zhigeng Zhang
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol (Amst)       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.916

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.