Literature DB >> 7971093

Spatial content and spatial quantisation effects in face recognition.

N P Costen1, D M Parker, I Craw.   

Abstract

It has recently become apparent that if face images are degraded by spatial quantisation, or block averaging, there is a nonlinear acceleration of the decline in accuracy of recognition as block size increases. This suggests recognition requires a critical minimum range of object spatial frequencies. Two experiments were performed to clarify the phenomenon. In experiment 1, the speed and accuracy of recognition for six frontoparallel photographs of faces were measured. After familiarisation training sessions, the images were shown for 100 ms with 11, 21, and 42 pixels per face, horizontally measured. Transformations calculated to remove the same range of spatial frequencies were performed by means of quantisation, a Fourier low-pass filter, and Gaussian blurring. Although accuracy declined and speed increased in a significant, nonlinear manner in all cases as the image quality was reduced, it did so at a faster rate for the quantised images. In experiment 2, faces rated as being typical were shown at 9, 12, 23, and 45 pixels per face and with appropriate Fourier low-pass versions. The nonlinear decline was confirmed and it was shown that it could not be attributed to a ceiling effect. A further condition allowed quantised and Fourier low-pass conditions to be compared with an unstructured-noise condition of equal strength to that of the quantised images. These gave comparable, but slightly less impaired, recognition than the quantised images. It can be inferred from these results that the removal of a critical range of at least 8-16 cycles per face of information explains the step decline in recognition seen with quantised images. However, the decline found with quantised images is reinforced by internal masking from pixelisation.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7971093     DOI: 10.1068/p230129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  23 in total

Review 1.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes.

Authors:  D J Morrison; P G Schyns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

Review 2.  Face perception: an integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Marcos Ruiz-Soler; Francesc S Beltran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-02

3.  What makes faces special?

Authors:  Xiaomin Yue; Bosco S Tjan; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Face processing in Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD): the roles of expertise and spatial frequency.

Authors:  M A Boeschoten; J L Kenemans; H van Engeland; C Kemner
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification.

Authors:  N P Costen; D M Parker; I Craw
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-05

6.  The face inversion effect in infants is driven by high, and not low, spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Karen R Dobkins; Rachael Harms
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Validation of the NIMH-ChEFS adolescent face stimulus set in an adolescent, parent, and health professional sample.

Authors:  Marika C Coffman; Andrea Trubanova; J Anthony Richey; Susan W White; Jungmeen Kim-Spoon; Thomas H Ollendick; Daniel S Pine
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.035

8.  Spatial-frequency cutoff requirements for pattern recognition in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Miyoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Face or building superiority in peripheral vision reversed by task requirements.

Authors:  Najate Jebara; Delphine Pins; Pascal Despretz; Muriel Boucart
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-09-08

10.  Does face image statistics predict a preferred spatial frequency for human face processing?

Authors:  Matthias S Keil
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.