Literature DB >> 8931597

Paradoxical functional facilitation in brain-behaviour research. A critical review.

N Kapur1.   

Abstract

The aim in this review article is to document research findings that have shown paradoxical effects of nervous system changes, whereby direct or indirect neural damage may result in facilitation of behavioural functions. Such findings have often been ignored or undervalued in the brain-behaviour research literature. A further aim is to consider possible mechanisms and theoretical insights related to this facilitation. Analyses of relevant studies show that two major types of paradoxical functional facilitation (PFF) effects may be distinguished. (i) Situations where damage to intact brain tissue brings to normal or near normal a previously subnormal or abnormal level of functioning. I refer to improved levels of functioning in such contexts as restorative PFF effects. One of the best documented examples of such PFF effects is the 'Sprague effect', whereby collicular lesions may bring about an improvement in visual functioning following an initial occipital lesion. (ii) Situations where a subject with nervous system pathology or sensory loss performs better than normal control subjects on a particular task. I refer to improved levels of performance in these contexts as enhancing PFF effects. Restorative and enhancing PFF effects have been found in a range of domains, including memory, sensory and perceptual functions, and language functioning. A potential contribution of PFF effects is that they highlight two important neural mechanisms, i.e. inhibition and compensatory plasticity. Two broad classes of theoretical insights related to PFF effects are therefore discussed: (i) inhibitory mechanisms, which form part of an interactive view of brain function where competitive opponent-processing is a significant feature; (ii) 'compensatory augmentation', which occurs as a specific manifestation of CNS plasticity. Both of these mechanisms are considered in relation to paradoxical increases in CBF and anatomical annexation effects that are seen in neurological patients and in subjects with sensory loss. Paradoxical functional facilitation paradigms represent a powerful methodological tool for confirming or refuting hypotheses in brain-behaviour research. The counter-intuitive nature of PFF findings provides a particularly persuasive set of evidence in support of neural, conceptual or computational models of brain function that specifically predict paradoxical facilitation of cognitive functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8931597     DOI: 10.1093/brain/119.5.1775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  77 in total

1.  A modulatory role for facial expressions in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Beatrice de Gelder; Ilja Frissen; Jason Barton; Nouchine Hadjikhani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Creativity and dementia: a review.

Authors:  Massimiliano Palmiero; Dina Di Giacomo; Domenico Passafiume
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-03-22

3.  Differential impact of continuous theta-burst stimulation over left and right DLPFC on planning.

Authors:  Christoph P Kaller; Katharina Heinze; Annekathrein Frenkel; Claus H Läppchen; Josef M Unterrainer; Cornelius Weiller; Rüdiger Lange; Benjamin Rahm
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Support of the concept of interhemispheric rivalry by two consecutive strokes occurring in both hemispheres: a case study.

Authors:  Ramona Sauerbrei; Joachim Liepert
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Research with rTMS in the treatment of aphasia.

Authors:  Margaret A Naeser; Paula I Martin; Ethan Treglia; Michael Ho; Elina Kaplan; Shahid Bashir; Roy Hamilton; H Branch Coslett; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Improved language in a chronic nonfluent aphasia patient after treatment with CPAP and TMS.

Authors:  Margaret A Naeser; Paula I Martin; Kristine Lundgren; Reva Klein; Jerome Kaplan; Ethan Treglia; Michael Ho; Marjorie Nicholas; Miguel Alonso; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Probabilistic reinforcement learning in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Marjorie Solomon; Anne C Smith; Michael J Frank; Stanford Ly; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.216

8.  Changes in artistic style after minor posterior stroke.

Authors:  J M Annoni; G Devuyst; A Carota; L Bruggimann; J Bogousslavsky
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Verbal creativity in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Teresa Q Wu; Zachary A Miller; Babu Adhimoolam; Diana D Zackey; Baber K Khan; Robin Ketelle; Katherine P Rankin; Bruce L Miller
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 0.881

Review 10.  Use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to influence behavior.

Authors:  Benzi M Kluger; William J Triggs
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.