Literature DB >> 22002416

Differential impact of continuous theta-burst stimulation over left and right DLPFC on planning.

Christoph P Kaller1, Katharina Heinze, Annekathrein Frenkel, Claus H Läppchen, Josef M Unterrainer, Cornelius Weiller, Rüdiger Lange, Benjamin Rahm.   

Abstract

Most neuroimaging studies on planning report bilateral activations of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Recently, these concurrent activations of left and right dlPFC have been shown to double dissociate with different cognitive demands imposed by the planning task: Higher demands on the extraction of task-relevant information led to stronger activation in left dlPFC, whereas higher demands on the integration of interdependent information into a coherent action sequence entailed stronger activation of right dlPFC. Here, we used continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) to investigate the supposed causal structure-function mapping underlying this double dissociation. Two groups of healthy subjects (left-lateralized stimulation, n = 26; right-lateralized stimulation, n = 26) were tested within-subject on a variant of the Tower of London task following either real cTBS over dlPFC or sham stimulation over posterior parietal cortex. Results revealed that, irrespective of specific task demands, cTBS over left and right dlPFC was associated with a global decrease and increase, respectively, in initial planning times compared to sham stimulation. Moreover, no interaction between task demands and stimulation type (real vs. sham) and/or stimulation side (left vs. right hemisphere) were found. Together, against expectations from previous neuroimaging data, lateralized cTBS did not lead to planning-parameter specific changes in performance, but instead revealed a global asymmetric pattern of faster versus slower task processing after left versus right cTBS. This global asymmetry in the absence of any task-parameter specific impact of cTBS suggests that different levels of information processing may span colocalized, but independent axes of functional lateralization in the dlPFC.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22002416      PMCID: PMC6870309          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  46 in total

1.  Cortico-cortical connectivity of the human mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex and its modulation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  T Paus; M A Castro-Alamancos; M Petrides
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  The Tower of London spatial problem-solving task: enhancing clinical and research implementation.

Authors:  W Keith Berg; Dana Byrd
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements.

Authors:  M Kobayashi; S Hutchinson; H Théoret; G Schlaug; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Reviewing the impact of problem structure on planning: a software tool for analyzing tower tasks.

Authors:  Christoph P Kaller; Benjamin Rahm; Lena Köstering; Josef M Unterrainer
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Dissociable contributions of left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in planning.

Authors:  Christoph P Kaller; Benjamin Rahm; Joachim Spreer; Cornelius Weiller; Josef M Unterrainer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The role of prefrontal cortex in visuo-spatial planning: A repetitive TMS study.

Authors:  Demis Basso; Martin Lotze; Lavinia Vitale; Florinda Ferreri; Patrizia Bisiacchi; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Paolo Maria Rossini; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dissociable roles of the posterior parietal and the prefrontal cortex in manipulation and monitoring processes.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Champod; Michael Petrides
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Specific impairments of planning.

Authors:  T Shallice
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-06-25       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  A 3-day estrogen treatment improves prefrontal cortex-dependent cognitive function in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Rosemarie Krug; Jan Born; Björn Rasch
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 4.905

10.  Imaging the brain activity changes underlying impaired visuospatial judgments: simultaneous FMRI, TMS, and behavioral studies.

Authors:  Alexander T Sack; Axel Kohler; Sven Bestmann; David E J Linden; Peter Dechent; Rainer Goebel; Juergen Baudewig
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  13 in total

1.  Neural signatures of third-party punishment: evidence from penetrating traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Leila Glass; Lara Moody; Jordan Grafman; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Emergence in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Steven Ravett Brown
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Differential patterns of planning impairments in Parkinson's disease and sub-clinical signs of dementia? A latent-class model-based approach.

Authors:  Lena Köstering; Audrey McKinlay; Christoph Stahl; Christoph P Kaller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation to the prefrontal or parietal cortex does not impair metacognitive visual awareness.

Authors:  Daniel Bor; David J Schwartzman; Adam B Barrett; Anil K Seth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Bilateral theta-burst magnetic stimulation influence on event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Nuno Pinto; Marta Duarte; Helena Gonçalves; Ricardo Silva; Jorge Gama; Maria Vaz Pato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Causal role of the inferolateral prefrontal cortex in balancing goal-directed and habitual control of behavior.

Authors:  Mario Bogdanov; Jan E Timmermann; Jan Gläscher; Friedhelm C Hummel; Lars Schwabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The relationship between the alterations in metabolite levels in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and clinical symptoms of patients with first-episode schizophrenia: a one year follow-up study.

Authors:  Manli Huang; Wuqiu Guo; Shaojia Lu; Fen Pan; Jinkai Chen; Jianbo Hu; Shaohua Hu; Weijuan Xu; Desheng Shang; Yi Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-04

8.  Non-invasive brain stimulation can induce paradoxical facilitation. Are these neuroenhancements transferable and meaningful to security services?

Authors:  Jean Levasseur-Moreau; Jerome Brunelin; Shirley Fecteau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Parallel processing of cognitive and physical demands in left and right prefrontal cortices during smartphone use while walking.

Authors:  Naoyuki Takeuchi; Takayuki Mori; Yoshimi Suzukamo; Naofumi Tanaka; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Impact of Prefrontal Theta Burst Stimulation on Clinical Neuropsychological Tasks.

Authors:  Raquel Viejo-Sobera; Diego Redolar-Ripoll; Mercè Boixadós; Marc Palaus; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Elena M Marron
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.