Literature DB >> 14561892

A modulatory role for facial expressions in prosopagnosia.

Beatrice de Gelder1, Ilja Frissen, Jason Barton, Nouchine Hadjikhani.   

Abstract

Brain-damaged patients experience difficulties in recognizing a face (prosopagnosics), but they can still recognize its expression. The dissociation between these two face-related skills has served as a keystone of models of face processing. We now report that the presence of a facial expression can influence face identification. For normal viewers, the presence of a facial expression influences performance negatively, whereas for prosopagnosic patients, it improves performance dramatically. Accordingly, although prosopagnosic patients show a failure to process the facial configuration in the interest of face identification, that ability returns when the face shows an emotional expression. Accompanying brain-imaging results indicate activation in brain areas (amygdala, superior temporal sulcus, parietal cortex) outside the occipitotemporal areas normally activated for face identification and lesioned in these patients. This finding suggests a modulatory role of these areas in face identification that is independent of occipitotemporal face areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14561892      PMCID: PMC240752          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1735530100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

1.  Activation of the right inferior frontal cortex during assessment of facial emotion.

Authors:  K Nakamura; R Kawashima; K Ito; M Sugiura; T Kato; A Nakamura; K Hatano; S Nagumo; K Kubota; H Fukuda; S Kojima
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas.

Authors:  Laurie Carr; Marco Iacoboni; Marie-Charlotte Dubeau; John C Mazziotta; Gian Luigi Lenzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Emotion, cognition, and behavior.

Authors:  R J Dolan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A Puce; J C Gore; T Allison
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Inversion superiority in visual agnosia may be common to a variety of orientation polarised objects besides faces.

Authors:  B de Gelder; A C Bachoud-Lévi; J D Degos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human visual cortex during face matching: a comparison with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  V P Clark; K Keil; J M Maisog; S Courtney; L G Ungerleider; J V Haxby
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The perception of curvature can be selectively disrupted in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; S E Hamilton; J H Bernstein
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Inversion and configuration of faces.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; J Searcy
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Structural encoding precludes recognition of face parts in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  B De Gelder; R Rouw
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08
View more
  31 in total

1.  Fear fosters flight: a mechanism for fear contagion when perceiving emotion expressed by a whole body.

Authors:  Beatrice de Gelder; Josh Snyder; Doug Greve; George Gerard; Nouchine Hadjikhani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Emotional automaticity is a matter of timing.

Authors:  Qian Luo; Tom Holroyd; Catherine Majestic; Xi Cheng; Julia Schechter; R James Blair
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Impaired face and body perception in developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Ruthger Righart; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The anatomic correlate of prosopagnosia in semantic dementia.

Authors:  K A Josephs; J L Whitwell; P Vemuri; M L Senjem; B F Boeve; D S Knopman; G E Smith; R J Ivnik; R C Petersen; C R Jack
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  The contribution of the fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in processing facial attractiveness: neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  G Iaria; C J Fox; C T Waite; I Aharon; J J S Barton
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-06-08       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Pointing with the eyes: the role of gaze in communicating danger.

Authors:  Nouchine Hadjikhani; Rick Hoge; Josh Snyder; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain.

Authors:  Kestutis Kveraga; Avniel S Ghuman; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?

Authors:  Rianne van Rooijen; Annemie Ploeger; Mariska E Kret
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

9.  Electrical stimulation of the left and right human fusiform gyrus causes different effects in conscious face perception.

Authors:  Vinitha Rangarajan; Dora Hermes; Brett L Foster; Kevin S Weiner; Corentin Jacques; Kalanit Grill-Spector; Josef Parvizi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Emotional attention in acquired prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Nadia Lucas; Eugene Mayer; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.