Literature DB >> 892375

Diagnostic accuracy of fiberendoscopy in the detection of upper intestinal malignancy. A follow-up analysis.

W Dekker, G N Tytgat.   

Abstract

The accuracy of fiberendoscopy with directed biopsy in the detection of upper intestinal malignancies has been evaluated by studying the operative or postmortem findings or the clinical follow-up data after at least 1 year and, for relevant lesions, after 2 or 3 years. Of 1005 patients examined, a satisfactory follow-up was obtained in 990. There turned out to be no false-positive diagnoses of malignancy in the 167 patients diagnosed fiberendoscopically to harbor an upper intestinal malignancy, and only two false-negative diagnoses in the fiberendoscopically benign group. Seven of the 135 adenocarcinomas of the stomach turned out to be early gastric cancers. The two missed malignancies were interpreted initially as benign gastric ulcers. The over-all endoscopic-bioptic accuracy rate calculated for all patients amounts to 99.8%. Such a high accuracy rate can only be reached provided high numbers of biopsies are taken, and particularly at least 10 of gastric ulcers and of suspicious lesions. Endoscopy by itself is not sufficiently reliable in determining the nature of the lesion. Indeed an incorrect endoscopic interpretation was made in 7.3% of the ulcerous lesions, and in 8.2% of them no firm conclusion could be reached.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 892375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Radiological imaging of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Part II. The stomach].

Authors:  L Grenacher; J Hansmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  A comparison of flexible and rigid endoscopy in evaluating esophageal cancer patients for surgery.

Authors:  H C Cheung; K F Siu; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Optimal number of endoscopic biopsies in diagnosis of advanced gastric and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yeowon Choi; Hyo Sun Choi; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Dong Il Park; Yong Kyun Cho; Hong Joo Kim; Jung Ho Park; Chong Il Sohn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Endoscopic follow-up for all gastric ulcers to detect malignancy?

Authors:  P Bytzer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Comparison of weight, depth, and diagnostic adequacy of specimens obtained with 16 different biopsy forceps designed for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  B J Danesh; M Burke; J Newman; A Aylott; P Whitfield; P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Accuracy of the first endoscopic procedure in the differential diagnosis of gastric lesions.

Authors:  O Llanos; S Guzmán; I Duarte
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Routine practice in the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a survey of tumours diagnosed in the Portsmouth and Oxford Health Districts 1979-1980.

Authors:  M Deakin; D G Colin-Jones; M P Vessey
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Gastric ulcers differ from duodenal ulcers. Evaluation of basal acid output.

Authors:  M J Collen; M J Sheridan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Effect of mucosal thickening near gastric carcinoma on the endoscopic diagnosis of malignancy.

Authors:  J A Awad; E Y Lee; T C Wang; K Deschryver-Kecskemeti; R E Clouse
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Endoscopy, gastric ulcer, and gastric cancer. Follow-up endoscopy for all gastric ulcers?

Authors:  R E Pruitt; C D Truss
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.