Literature DB >> 3420055

Routine practice in the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a survey of tumours diagnosed in the Portsmouth and Oxford Health Districts 1979-1980.

M Deakin1, D G Colin-Jones, M P Vessey.   

Abstract

If the poor prognosis for patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach is to be improved, it is important to make the diagnosis at an early stage. In order to evaluate our routine diagnostic practice, we have performed a retrospective study of patients in the Portsmouth and Oxford Health Districts who were diagnosed as having adenocarcinoma of the stomach during 1979 and 1980. Three hundred and forty-two patients were identified; the great majority had advanced disease at the first presentation. Only 9 patients (2.6%) were identified as having early gastric carcinoma and a total of 46 patients (13.4%) had either Stage 1 or 2 disease. Despite the provision of an endoscopy service, gastric carcinoma is still being diagnosed at an advanced stage. Initial false negative investigations caused a delay in diagnosis in 18.4% of patients. During the year preceding diagnosis (when tumour was likely to have been present), the false negative rate for barium meal examination was 25.5% and for endoscopy 13.5%. Negative results should not deter us from pursuing the diagnosis of tumour in those patients with persisting symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3420055      PMCID: PMC2428741          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.64.747.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  18 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of fiberendoscopy in the detection of upper intestinal malignancy. A follow-up analysis.

Authors:  W Dekker; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Fibreoptic endoscopy and the barium meal--results and implications.

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-04-21

3.  Double contrast examination of the stomach compared with endoscopy.

Authors:  P Keto; H Suoranta; T Ihamäki; E Melartin
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1979

4.  Gastric ulcer: is endoscopy always necessary?

Authors:  R H Salter; D K Gill; T G Girdwood; R H McNeil; G Athey
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-06-27

5.  Natural history of "early" gastric cancer: results of a 10-year regional survey.

Authors:  J W Fielding; D J Ellis; B G Jones; J Paterson; D J Powell; J A Waterhouse; V S Brookes
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-10-11

6.  Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  D Y Graham; J T Schwartz; G D Cain; F Gyorkey
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Gastric cancer detection in gastric ulcer disease.

Authors:  R A Mountford; P Brown; P R Salmon; C Alvarenga; C S Neumann; A E Read
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Cimetidine and gastric cancer: preliminary report from post-marketing surveillance study.

Authors:  D G Colin-Jones; M J Langman; D H Lawson; M P Vessey
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-11-06

9.  Cimetidine and gastric cancer.

Authors:  J B Elder; P C Ganguli; I E Gillespie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-05-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Prospective study of "early" gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Tsukuma; T Mishima; A Oshima
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1983-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of barium meal examination.

Authors:  M Deakin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-01-20

2.  Improving the standards of endoscopy.

Authors:  D G Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 23.059

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.