Literature DB >> 2307077

Effect of mucosal thickening near gastric carcinoma on the endoscopic diagnosis of malignancy.

J A Awad1, E Y Lee, T C Wang, K Deschryver-Kecskemeti, R E Clouse.   

Abstract

Gastric mucosal thickening of variable degree occurs in the vicinity of gastric carcinomas and is possibly related to simultaneous tumor expression of epidermal growth factor and its receptor. Seventeen cases in which both endoscopic biopsy and subsequent resection for gastric carcinoma had been performed were studied to see if putative tumor-related mucosal thickening had an effect on endoscopic biopsy sensitivity. Biopsy fragment positivity rate was greater in cases with exophytic, protruding tumor masses (46.8 +/- 8.5%) than in all other cases (17.0 +/- 4.7%; P = 0.02). Thickness of nontumorous mucosa adjacent to carcinomas did not significantly affect the biopsy fragment positivity rate in cases with exophytic masses ("thin" subgroup, 51.0 +/- 16.2%; "thick" subgroup, 44.0 +/- 10.8%; P = 0.7) but did reduce the positivity rate significantly (P = 0.05) in ulcerative or infiltrative tumors without exophytic components ("thin" subgroup, 23.3 +/- 4.1%; "thick" subgroup, 8.4 +/- 2.1%). This reduction in biopsy sensitivity related to mucosal thickening occurring adjacent to nonprotuberant lesions may explain, at least in part, the variable rates of positive biopsies observed with gastric cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2307077     DOI: 10.1007/bf01537408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  10 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of fiberendoscopy in the detection of upper intestinal malignancy. A follow-up analysis.

Authors:  W Dekker; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Mucosal thickening adjacent to gastric malignancy: association with epidermal growth factor.

Authors:  E Y Lee; T C Wang; R E Clouse; K DeSchryver-Kecskemeti
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Evaluation of fibergastroscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer: a study of 339 cases.

Authors:  A Misumi; K Mori; T Ikeda; K Misumi; F Ookubo; M Shimamoto; K Nakashima; K Fujishima; Y Yagi; S Takano; Y Shiraishi; M Akagi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1978

4.  An evaluation of gastric biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  F J Sancho-Poch; J Balanzó; J Ocaña; E Presa; E Sala-Cladera; X Cussó; F Vilardell
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Importance of the site of endoscopic gastric biopsy in ulcerating lesions of the stomach.

Authors:  A R Hatfield; G Slavin; A W Segal; A J Levi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Endoscopic diagnosis of advanced gastric cancer. Factors influencing yield.

Authors:  S J Winawer; G Posner; C J Lightdale; P Sherlock; M Melamed; J G Fortner
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  D Y Graham; J T Schwartz; G D Cain; F Gyorkey
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Evaluation of specific value of endoscopic biopsies and brush cytology for malignancies of the oesophagus and stomach.

Authors:  L Witzel; F Halter; P A Grétillat; U Scheurer; M Keller
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Value of biopsy and brush cytology in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Shanghai Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Cooperative Group, People's Republic of China.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy in the diagnosis of cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  A H Qizilbash; M Castelli; M A Kowalski; A Churly
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.319

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.