Literature DB >> 7055400

Accuracy of the first endoscopic procedure in the differential diagnosis of gastric lesions.

O Llanos, S Guzmán, I Duarte.   

Abstract

The accuracy of endoscopy and directed biopsy in the differential diagnosis of gastric lesions was evaluated by comparing the diagnoses of one endoscopic procedure (endoscopy and multiple directed biopsies) with the definitive diagnoses in 333 patients. The overall endoscopic and bioptic accuracy rate for all patients amounted to 98.8%. Separate accuracy rates of endoscopy alone and biopsy were 86.5% and 94.9%, respectively. The reliability of endoscopy was similar in the diagnosis of malignant and benign lesions (86% and 89%). Endoscopic biopsy was correct in 99.1+ of benign lesions and in 86% of malignancies. False negative rates were 3.9% for endoscopy and 4.0% for biopsy. It is concluded that one endoscopic procedure is a highly reliable method in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant gastric lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7055400      PMCID: PMC1352447          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198202000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  8 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of fiberendoscopy in the detection of upper intestinal malignancy. A follow-up analysis.

Authors:  W Dekker; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  [Gastroscopy with gastric biopsy in 50 patients with carcinoma of the stomach radiologically probable or certain (author's transl)].

Authors:  D Blanc; F Boulenger; J L Préel; J P Hardouin
Journal:  Arch Fr Mal App Dig       Date:  1976 Apr-May

3.  Evaluation of biopsy and cytology in the diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  T Kasugai; S Kobayashi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer: current status and recent progress.

Authors:  P Sherlock; A N Ehrlich; S J Winawer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  [Endoscopic aspects and results of controlled biopsy in 165 cases of stomach cancer].

Authors:  C Liguory; F Bodin; P Capelle; H Lichtenstein; J Conte-Marti; M Conte
Journal:  Arch Fr Mal App Dig       Date:  1972-09

6.  Diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  A W Segal; M J Healy; A G COX; I Williams; G Slavin; A Smithers; A J Levi
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-06-21

7.  [The value of the first endoscopic exam in the differential diagnosis of gastric ulcer (author's transl].

Authors:  O Llanos; S Guzmán; I Duarte
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 0.553

8.  Evaluation of specific value of endoscopic biopsies and brush cytology for malignancies of the oesophagus and stomach.

Authors:  L Witzel; F Halter; P A Grétillat; U Scheurer; M Keller
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 23.059

  8 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Radiological imaging of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Part II. The stomach].

Authors:  L Grenacher; J Hansmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Follow-up endoscopy for benign-appearing gastric ulcers has no additive value in detecting malignancy: It is time to individualise surveillance endoscopy.

Authors:  Eric A R Gielisse; Johan P Kuyvenhoven
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Endoscopy, gastric ulcer, and gastric cancer. Follow-up endoscopy for all gastric ulcers?

Authors:  R E Pruitt; C D Truss
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Characteristic waffle-like appearance of gastric linitis plastica: A case report.

Authors:  Emiko Maeda; Makoto Oryu; Joji Tani; Hisaaki Miyoshi; Asahiro Morishita; Hirohito Yoneyama; Hideki Kobara; Hirohito Mori; Tsutomu Masaki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS).

Authors:  Sabina Beg; Krish Ragunath; Andrew Wyman; Matthew Banks; Nigel Trudgill; D Mark Pritchard; Stuart Riley; John Anderson; Helen Griffiths; Pradeep Bhandari; Phillip Kaye; Andrew Veitch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Enhancement patterns of gastric carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: relationship with clinicopathological features.

Authors:  Fang Wei; Pintong Huang; Shiyan Li; Jian Chen; Ying Zhang; Yurong Hong; Shumei Wei; David Cosgrove
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in preoperative Borrmann classification of advanced gastric carcinoma: comparison with histopathology.

Authors:  Minqiang Pan; Pintong Huang; Shiyan Li; Jian Chen; Shumei Wei; Ying Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.