Literature DB >> 8923068

The influence of length of stay in the ICU on power of discrimination of a multipurpose severity score (SAPS). ARCHIDIA.

A Sicignano1, C Carozzi, D Giudici, G Merli, S Arlati, M Pulici.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess how the power of discrimination of a multipurpose severity score (Simplified Acute Physiology Score; SAPS) changes in relation to the length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU).
DESIGN: In order to compute the SAPS probability, a model derived from logistic regression was developed in a cohort of 8059 patients. Measures of calibration (goodness-of-fit statistics) and discrimination [receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and relative area under the curve (AUC)] were adopted in a developmental set (5389 patients) and a validation set (2670 patients), both randomly selected. Once the logit was developed and the model validated, the whole database (8059 patients) was again assembled. To evaluate the accuracy of first-day SAPS probability over time, area under the ROC curve was computed for each of the initial 10 days of ICU care and for day 15.
SETTING: 24 Italian ICUs. PATIENTS: A total of 8059 patients out of 10065 consecutive admissions over a period of 3 years (1990-1992) were included in this study. Patients whose SAPS was not correctly compiled (n = 687), patients younger than 18 years (n = 442), and patients whose LOS was less than 24 h (n = 877) were excluded from this analysis.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: The logistic model gave good results in terms of calibration and discrimination, both in the developmental set (goodness-of-fit: chi 2 = 9.24, p = 0.32; AUC = 0.79 +/- 0.01) and in the validation set (goodness-of-fit: chi 2 = 8.95, p = 0.537; AUC = 0.78 +/- 0.01). The AUC for the whole database showed a loss in discrimination closely related to LOS: 0.79 +/- 0.01 at a day 1 and 0.59 +/- 0.02 at day 15.
CONCLUSION: The logistic model that we developed meets high standards for discrimination and calibration. However, SAPS loses its discriminative power over time; accuracy of prediction is maintained at an acceptable level only in patients who stay in the ICU no longer than 5 days. The stay in the ICU represents a complex variable, which is not predictable, that influences the performance of SAPS on the first day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8923068     DOI: 10.1007/bf01699226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  10 in total

1.  Identification of adverse events occurring during hospitalization. A cross-sectional study of litigation, quality assurance, and medical records at two teaching hospitals.

Authors:  T A Brennan; A R Localio; L L Leape; N M Laird; L Peterson; H H Hiatt; B A Barnes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Modified system outcome score and outcome index--method of monitoring patient care in a special care area.

Authors:  J Gilbert; J Schoolfield; D Gaydou; A McFee; R B Smith
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Modeling the severity of illness of ICU patients. A systems update.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; J R Le Gall
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-10-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients.

Authors:  J R Le Gall; P Loirat; A Alperovitch; P Glaser; C Granthil; D Mathieu; P Mercier; R Thomas; D Villers
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.

Authors:  J R Le Gall; S Lemeshow; F Saulnier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  ["ARCHIDIA": a system for patients' data collection and computerized filing. Part I. Methodology].

Authors:  D Carugo; M Dei Poli; A Guarino; P Navalesi; D Radrizzani; A Ravizza; F Roveda; A Sicignano; S Vesconi
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Daily prognostic estimates for critically ill adults in intensive care units: results from a prospective, multicenter, inception cohort analysis.

Authors:  D P Wagner; W A Knaus; F E Harrell; J E Zimmerman; C Watts
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Mortality probability models for patients in the intensive care unit for 48 or 72 hours: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; J Klar; D Teres; J S Avrunin; S H Gehlbach; J Rapoport; M Rué
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.598

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Scoring systems for daily assessment in intensive care medicine. Overview, current possibilities and demands on new developments].

Authors:  F Brenck; B Hartmann; M Mogk; A Junger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Use of the sequential organ failure assessment score as a severity score.

Authors:  André Carlos Kajdacsy-Balla Amaral; Fábio Moreira Andrade; Rui Moreno; Antonio Artigas; Francis Cantraine; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Predictive Performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and the Initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score in Acutely Ill Intensive Care Patients: Post-Hoc Analyses of the SUP-ICU Inception Cohort Study.

Authors:  Anders Granholm; Morten Hylander Møller; Mette Krag; Anders Perner; Peter Buhl Hjortrup
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Clinical review: mass casualty triage--pandemic influenza and critical care.

Authors:  Kirsty Challen; Andrew Bentley; John Bright; Darren Walter
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Factors associated with a prolonged length of stay after acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

Authors:  Ying Wang; Knut Stavem; Fredrik A Dahl; Sjur Humerfelt; Torbjørn Haugen
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2014-01-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.