OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the SOFA score can be used to develop a model to predict intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in different countries. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of a prospectively collected database. Patients with ICU stay longer than 2 days were studied to develop a mortality prediction model based on measurements of organ dysfunction. PATIENTS: 748 patients from six countries. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Two logistic regression models were constructed, one based on the SOFA maximum (SOFA Max model) and the other on variables identified by multivariate regression (SOFA Max-infection model). The H and C statistics had a p value above 0.05 for both models, but the D statistics showed a poor performance on the SOFA Max model when stratified for the presence of infection. Subsequent analysis was performed with SOFA Max-infection model. The area under the curve was 0.853. There were no statistically significant differences in observed and predicted mortalities except for one country which had a higher than predicted ICU mortality both in the overall population (28.3 vs. 19.1%) and in the noninfected patients (21.4 vs. 12.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The SOFA Max adjusted for age and the presence of infection can predict mortality in this population, but in one country the ICU mortality was higher than expected. Our data do not allow us to determine the reasons behind these differences, and further studies to detect differences in mortality between countries and to elucidate the basis for these differences should be encouraged.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the SOFA score can be used to develop a model to predict intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in different countries. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of a prospectively collected database. Patients with ICU stay longer than 2 days were studied to develop a mortality prediction model based on measurements of organ dysfunction. PATIENTS: 748 patients from six countries. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Two logistic regression models were constructed, one based on the SOFA maximum (SOFA Max model) and the other on variables identified by multivariate regression (SOFA Max-infection model). The H and C statistics had a p value above 0.05 for both models, but the D statistics showed a poor performance on the SOFA Max model when stratified for the presence of infection. Subsequent analysis was performed with SOFA Max-infection model. The area under the curve was 0.853. There were no statistically significant differences in observed and predicted mortalities except for one country which had a higher than predicted ICU mortality both in the overall population (28.3 vs. 19.1%) and in the noninfected patients (21.4 vs. 12.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The SOFA Max adjusted for age and the presence of infection can predict mortality in this population, but in one country the ICU mortality was higher than expected. Our data do not allow us to determine the reasons behind these differences, and further studies to detect differences in mortality between countries and to elucidate the basis for these differences should be encouraged.
Authors: M Antonelli; R Moreno; J L Vincent; C L Sprung; A Mendoça; M Passariello; L Riccioni; J Osborn Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: R Moreno; J L Vincent; R Matos; A Mendonça; F Cantraine; L Thijs; J Takala; C Sprung; M Antonelli; H Bruining; S Willatts Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Paul S Ciechanowski; Lois Downey; Julia Gold; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Sarah E Shannon; Patsy D Treece; Jessica P Young; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-02-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Alpha A Fowler; Jonathon D Truwit; R Duncan Hite; Peter E Morris; Christine DeWilde; Anna Priday; Bernard Fisher; Leroy R Thacker; Ramesh Natarajan; Donald F Brophy; Robin Sculthorpe; Rahul Nanchal; Aamer Syed; Jamie Sturgill; Greg S Martin; Jonathan Sevransky; Markos Kashiouris; Stella Hamman; Katherine F Egan; Andrei Hastings; Wendy Spencer; Shawnda Tench; Omar Mehkri; James Bindas; Abhijit Duggal; Jeanette Graf; Stephanie Zellner; Lynda Yanny; Catherine McPolin; Tonya Hollrith; David Kramer; Charles Ojielo; Tessa Damm; Evan Cassity; Aleksandra Wieliczko; Matthew Halquist Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Patsy D Treece; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Julia Gold; Paul S Ciechanowski; Sarah E Shannon; Nita Khandelwal; Jessica P Young; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Elliott D Crouser; Guohong Shao; Mark W Julian; Jennifer E Macre; Gerald S Shadel; Susheela Tridandapani; Qin Huang; Mark D Wewers Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 7.598