Literature DB >> 18239898

[Scoring systems for daily assessment in intensive care medicine. Overview, current possibilities and demands on new developments].

F Brenck1, B Hartmann, M Mogk, A Junger.   

Abstract

Scoring systems are a fixed element of modern diagnostics and are integrated in the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) billing system as well as quality assurance projects. The ongoing developments require classification according to the terms of use in order to maintain an overview of the numerous systems available. In the area of intensive care medicine scoring systems can be divided into admission scores and progress scores, whereby the scores for daily assessment can be further subdivided into five categories, depending on the target criteria: objective description of the grade of organ dysfunction, progression in intensive care therapy, evaluation of the degree of nursing care, determination of outcome/mortality risk, and grouping of patient collectives for clinical trials. In future developments it will be necessary to generate new strategies to adequately describe the progress of a patient. Not only will mortality be challenged as a target criterion but also the handling of missing data and the simplification of reality by categorization practised so far that can be found in all established scoring systems as far as calculation of predictive values regarding a defined result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18239898     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-007-1299-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  40 in total

1.  Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care.

Authors:  D J Cullen; J M Civetta; B A Briggs; L C Ferrara
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1974 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Predicting outcome among intensive care unit patients using computerised trend analysis of daily Apache II scores corrected for organ system failure.

Authors:  R W Chang; S Jacobs; B Lee
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: update 1983.

Authors:  A R Keene; D J Cullen
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Tiss 76 and Tiss 28: correlation of two therapeutic activity indices on a Spanish multicenter ICU database.

Authors:  E Castillo-Lorente; R Rivera-Fernandez; M Rodriguez-Elvira; G Vazquez-Mata
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Application of SOFA score to trauma patients. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

Authors:  M Antonelli; R Moreno; J L Vincent; C L Sprung; A Mendoça; M Passariello; L Riccioni; J Osborn
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Daily assessment of severity of illness and mortality prediction for individual patients.

Authors:  M Rué; S Quintana; M Alvarez; A Artigas
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; J E Zimmerman; D P Wagner; E A Draper; D E Lawrence
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Scoring system for the selection of high-risk patients in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Gaetano Iapichino; Giovanni Mistraletti; Davide Corbella; Gabriele Bassi; Erika Borotto; Dinis Reis Miranda; Alberto Morabito
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome.

Authors:  J C Marshall; D J Cook; N V Christou; G R Bernard; C L Sprung; W J Sibbald
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  [Prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting using an artificial neural network].

Authors:  M Traeger; A Eberhart; G Geldner; A M Morin; C Putzke; H Wulf; L H J Eberhart
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.041

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Scoring systems in intensive care medicine : principles, models, application and limits].

Authors:  V Fleig; F Brenck; M Wolff; M A Weigand
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Intensive care of patients with [infarct-related] cardiogenic shock : Abridged version of the S1 guideline].

Authors:  C Hermes; T Ochmann; C Keienburg; M Kegel; D Schindele; J Klausmeier; E Adrigan
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.552

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.