Literature DB >> 8921614

Effects of D-amphetamine on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement.

M G LeSage1, T Byrne, A Poling.   

Abstract

The present study examined in 8-hour sessions the effects of d-amphetamine (1.0, 5.6, and 10 mg/kg) on the acquisition of lever-press responding in rats that were exposed to procedures in which water delivery was delayed by 0, 8, or 16 seconds relative to the response that produced it. Both nonresetting- and resetting-delay conditions were studied. Although neither shaping nor autoshaping occurred, substantial levels of operative-lever responding developed under all conditions in which responses produced water. The lowest dose (1.0 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine either had no effect on or increased operative-lever pressing, whereas higher doses typically produced an initial reduction in lever pressing. Nonetheless, overall rates of operative-lever pressing at these doses were as high as, or higher than, those observed with vehicle. Thus, response acquisition was observed under all reinforcement procedures at all drug doses. In the absence of the drug, most responding occurred on the operative lever when reinforcement was immediate. Such differential responding also developed under both nonresetting- and resetting-delay procedures when the delay was 8 seconds, but not when it was 16 seconds. d-Amphetamine did not affect the development of differential responding under any procedure. Thus, consistent with d-amphetamine's effects under repeated acquisition procedures, the drug had no detrimental effect on learning until doses that produced general behavioral disruption were administered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8921614      PMCID: PMC1284574          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Acquisition of lever-press responding in rats with delayed reinforcement: A comparison of three procedures.

Authors:  J Wilkenfield; M Nickel; E Blakely; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal; S Gleeson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1990-01

3.  Response acquisition by Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens) with delayed visual reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal; B Metzger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The acute effects of caffeine, cocaine and d-amphetamine on the repeated acquisition responding of pigeons.

Authors:  E B Evans; G R Wenger
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Repeated acquisition of response sequences: effects of d-amphetamine and chlorpromazine.

Authors:  D M Thompson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1974 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Analysis of the acquisition and extinction of food-reinforced behaviour in rats after the administration of chlorpromazine.

Authors:  I P Stolerman
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1971

Review 7.  Amphetamine: effects on catecholamine systems and behavior.

Authors:  L S Seiden; K E Sabol; G A Ricaurte
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 13.820

8.  Effects of pentobarbital and d-amphetamine on the repeated acquisition of response sequences by pigeons.

Authors:  J Harting; D E Mcmillian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1976-09-29       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Response acquisition with fixed and variable resetting delays of reinforcement in male and female Wistar rats.

Authors:  F van Haaren
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1992-10

10.  Acquisition of a spatially defined operant with delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  T S Critchfield; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  The effects of behavioral history on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Susan Snycerski; Sean Laraway; Bradley E Huitema; Alan Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Acquisition of cocaine self-administration with unsignaled delayed reinforcement in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Chad M Galuska; James H Woods
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Contingency tracking during unsignaled delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Josue Keely; Tyler Feola; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement delay.

Authors:  Wei-Min Ta; Raymond C Pitts; Christine E Hughes; Anthony P McLean; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response induction during the acquisition and maintenance of lever pressing with delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Rogelio Escobar; Carlos A Bruner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement: a comparison of two-lever procedures.

Authors:  G Sutphin; T Byrne; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Amphetamine increases schedule-induced drinking reduced by negative punishment procedures.

Authors:  Angeles Pérez-Padilla; Ricardo Pellón
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Response acquisition by humans with delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Hiroto Okouchi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.