Literature DB >> 8919341

The risk of infection of three synthetic materials used in rectopexy with or without colonic resection for rectal prolapse.

S Athanasiadis1, G Weyand, J Heiligers, L Heumuller, L Barthelmes.   

Abstract

The incidence of infection was compared after the use of synthetic implants in abdominal rectopexy with (145 patients) and without (77 patients) synchronous colon resection. Three different materials were used, including polyvinyl alcohol (Ivalon) (n = 87), polyglactin (Vicryl) mesh (n = 109), and Gore-Tex (n = 26). In patients have colonic resection two (3.7%) pelvic infections occurred in the polyvinyl alcohol (Ivalon) group, one abdominal infection with polyglactin (Vicryl) and none with Gore-Tex. In the group without colonic resection, two patients (3.0%) developed infection after polyvinyl alcohol (Ivalon) insertion with one occurring after polyglactin (Vicryl) or Gore-Tex. Overall mortality was 0.4%. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 120 months. There were 3 (1.9%) cases of recurrent prolapse in 151 patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8919341     DOI: 10.1007/bf00418855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  25 in total

1.  Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  J Sayfan; M Pinho; J Alexander-Williams; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  [Problems of pelvic infection following rectopexy using synthetics and its treatment].

Authors:  J Wedell; M Schlageter; P Meier zu Eissen; G Banzhaf; W Castrup; H van Calker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Experiences of Ivalon-sponge implant for complete rectal prolapse at St. Mark's Hospital, 1960-70.

Authors:  J C Penfold; P R Hawley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  One hundred consecutive cases of complete prolapse of the rectum treated by operation.

Authors:  C A Küpfer; J C Goligher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  [Value of abdominal rectopexy in obstructive disorders of defecation. A prospective study using a defecation index, manometry and radiology].

Authors:  S Athanasiadis; J Heiligers
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1993

6.  Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Influence of surgical technique on functional outcome.

Authors:  M Scaglia; S Fasth; T Hallgren; S Nordgren; T Oresland; L Hultén
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Complications of the Ripstein procedure.

Authors:  P H Gordon; B Hoexter
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1978 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  P Luukkonen; U Mikkonen; H Järvinen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse.

Authors:  J L McCue; J P Thomson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  M R Keighley; J W Fielding; J Alexander-Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  10 in total

1.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  David P O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

Review 2.  The role of synthetic and biologic materials in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ramon A Brown; C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

3.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biological mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Sileri; Luana Franceschilli; Elisabetta de Luca; Sara Lazzaro; Giulio P Angelucci; Valeria Fiaschetti; Carolina Pasecenic; Achille L Gaspari
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse: a critical appraisal of the first 100 cases.

Authors:  L Franceschilli; D Varvaras; I Capuano; C I Ciangola; F Giorgi; G Boehm; A L Gaspari; P Sileri
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Functional outcome after perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Franc H Hetzer; Amir H Roushan; Katja Wolf; Ulrich Beutner; Jan Borovicka; Jochen Lange; Lukas Marti
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Outcome of submucosal injection of different sclerosing materials for rectal prolapse in children.

Authors:  M A Baky Fahmy; Sahar Ezzelarab
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 7.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Stavros Gourgiotis; Sotirios Baratsis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: mesh, no mesh or a ventral mesh?

Authors:  Deepraj S Bhandarkar
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic suture rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse complicated by a solitary ulcer and obstructed defecation: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Narimantas Evaldas Samalavičius; Edvinas Kildušis
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2013-05-30

10.  Intrarectal Mesh Migration with Recurrence After Transabdominal Mesh Rectopexy.

Authors:  Rahul Gupta; Gautham Krishnamurthy; G R Verma
Journal:  ACG Case Rep J       Date:  2016-01-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.