Literature DB >> 25435827

The role of synthetic and biologic materials in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Ramon A Brown1, C Neal Ellis2.   

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse is a significant medical problem that poses a diagnostic and management dilemma. These diseases cause serious morbidity in those affected and treatment is sought for relief of pelvic pain, rectal bleeding, chronic constipation, obstructed defecation, and fecal incontinence. Numerous procedures have been proposed to treat these conditions; however, the search continues as colorectal surgeons attempt to find the procedure that would optimally treat these conditions. The use of prosthetics in the repair of pelvic organ prolapse has become prevalent as the benefits of their use are realized. While advances in biologic mesh and new surgical techniques promise improved functional outcomes with decreased complication rates without de novo symptoms, the debate concerning the best prosthetic material, synthetic or biologic, remains controversial. Furthermore, laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy has emerged as a procedure that could potentially fill this role and is rapidly becoming the procedure of choice for the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biologic mesh; pelvic organ prolapse; ventral mesh rectopexy

Year:  2014        PMID: 25435827      PMCID: PMC4226752          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1394157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  76 in total

1.  Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate?

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck; O Schwandner; J Scheele; S Farke; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  The use of prosthetics in pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Colin Birch
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 5.237

3.  Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Matthew D Barber; Tristi W Muir; Mark D Walters
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Changes in connective tissue in patients with pelvic organ prolapse--a review of the current literature.

Authors:  M H Kerkhof; L Hendriks; H A M Brölmann
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-10-15

5.  The risk of infection of three synthetic materials used in rectopexy with or without colonic resection for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  S Athanasiadis; G Weyand; J Heiligers; L Heumuller; L Barthelmes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Mesh augmentation during pelvic-floor reconstructive surgery: risks and benefits.

Authors:  Kaven Baessler; Christopher F Maher
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 7.  Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Caitlin W Hicks; Andreas M Kaiser; Karim Alavi; Ranjan Sudan; Paul E Wise
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short-term outcome.

Authors:  Matti V Kairaluoma; Mikko T Viljakka; Ilmo H Kellokumpu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 9.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Elisabeth J Adams; Suzanne Hagen; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

10.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biological mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Sileri; Luana Franceschilli; Elisabetta de Luca; Sara Lazzaro; Giulio P Angelucci; Valeria Fiaschetti; Carolina Pasecenic; Achille L Gaspari
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Synthetic Versus Biological Mesh-Related Erosion After Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Balla; Silvia Quaresima; Sebastian Smolarek; Mostafa Shalaby; Giulia Missori; Pierpaolo Sileri
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2017-04-28

2.  Laparoscopic Rectopexy with Urinary Bladder Xenograft Reinforcement.

Authors:  Aradhana Mehta; Rami Afshar; David L Warner; Amy Gardner; Ellen Ackerman; Jared Brandt; Kent C Sasse
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.