Literature DB >> 8908860

Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients.

T Jemt1, K Book.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to statistically correlate in vivo measurements of prosthesis misfit and change of marginal bone level in implants placed in the edentulous maxilla. Two groups, each comprising seven patients, were followed up either prospectively for 1 year or retrospectively for the last 4 years of the 5-year period after second-stage surgery. Measurements of prosthesis misfit were performed by means of a three-dimensional photogrammetric technique, and marginal bone levels were measured from standard intraoral radiographs. Results showed that none of the prostheses presented a completely passive fit to the implants in vivo. Furthermore, similar distortions of the prostheses were found in the two groups, indicating that the implants seemed to be stable and did not move, even after several years in function. The maximal range of three-dimensional distortion of cylinder center points was about 275 microns for both groups. Mean center point misfit was 111 (SD 59) and 91 (SD 51) microns for the 1-year and 5-year groups, respectively. The corresponding mean marginal bone loss was 0.5 and 0.2 mm for the two follow-up groups. No statistical correlations (P > .05) between change of marginal bone levels and different parameters of prosthesis misfit were observed in the two groups. The study indicated that a certain biologic tolerance for misfit may be present. The degree of misfit reported in the study was clinically acceptable with regard to observed marginal bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8908860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  23 in total

1.  Radiological evaluation of the Cresco system in combination with Osseospeed implants: a preliminary 3-year report.

Authors:  N Baldini; M DE Sanctis; M C Cagidiaco; P Balleri; F Vignoletti; C Goracci; M Ferrari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2014-12-27

2.  Prosthetic misfit of implant-supported prosthesis obtained by an alternative section method.

Authors:  Rodrigo Tiossi; Hilmo Barreto Leite Falcão-Filho; Fábio Afrânio de Aguiar; Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues; Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos; Ricardo Faria Ribeiro
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 3.  Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit Implant Prosthesis Understanding and Achieving: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Muaiyed Mahmoud Buzayan; Norsiah Binti Yunus
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-28

4.  Computer-aided flapless implant surgery and immediate loading. A technical note.

Authors:  Alfonso Baruffaldi; Pier Paolo Poli; Andrea Baruffaldi; Lorenzo Giberti; Maurizio Pigozzo; Carlo Maiorana
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-04-05

5.  Experimental study on the factors affecting torque of beam-type implant torque wrenches.

Authors:  Hiroki Shiba; Yuji Sato; Junichi Furuya; Tokiko Osawa; Akio Isobe; Myu Hayashi; Noboru Kitagawa
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Development of implant loading device for animal study about various loading protocol: a pilot study.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yoon; Young-Bum Park; Yuna Cho; Chang-Sung Kim; Seong-Ho Choi; Hong-Seok Moon; Keun-Woo Lee; June-Sung Shim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Si-Hoon Jo; Kyoung-Il Kim; Jae-Min Seo; Kwang-Yeob Song; Ju-Mi Park; Seung-Geun Ahn
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods.

Authors:  Sang-Jik Lee; Sung-Bum Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Accuracy combining different brands of implants and abutments.

Authors:  María-Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Eduardo Selva-Otaolaurruchi; Gisela Senent-Vicente; Inés González-de-Cossio; Vicente Amigó-Borrás
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-03-01

10.  Comparative study on stress distribution around internal tapered connection implants according to fit of cement- and screw-retained prostheses.

Authors:  Mi-Young Lee; Seong-Joo Heo; Eun-Jin Park; Ji-Man Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.