Literature DB >> 1591970

Detection duration thresholds and evoked potential measures of stereosensitivity.

M L Manning1, D C Finlay, S A Dewis, D B Dunlop.   

Abstract

Visual evoked potentials have been proposed by some researchers to be more useful than behavioral techniques to evaluate stereo performance in children and certain clinical populations. Stimulus duration detection thresholds, visual evoked potentials, and scalp electrical potential distribution maps to dynamic random dot stereograms were studied. A high degree of correspondence was found between visual evoked potential amplitudes and behaviorally determined detection thresholds. Upper field stimuli had higher detection thresholds and generated lower-amplitude visual evoked potential responses than did centrally presented stimuli. For the most eccentrically presented stimuli, lower detection thresholds were found for stimuli presented in the right visual field than the left visual field. This finding was consistent with the pattern of VEP responses to be lateralized, with higher-amplitude responses recorded over left-hemisphere sites. The study examined a proposal that the major negative component of the stereoscopic visual evoked potential originates in cortical area V1. The results failed to support the proposal and were consistent with the main negative component of the VEP being generated in V2, rather than V1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1591970     DOI: 10.1007/bf00156575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  16 in total

1.  On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision.

Authors:  C WHEATSTONE
Journal:  Optom Wkly       Date:  1962-11-22

2.  Dynamic random-dot stereograms reveal up-down anisotropy and left-right isotropy between cortical hemifields.

Authors:  B Breitmeyer; B Julesz; W Kropfl
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-01-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Scalp response topography to dynamic random dot stereograms.

Authors:  R A Neill; B Fenelon
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-03

4.  Detection threshold differences to crossed and uncrossed disparities.

Authors:  M L Manning; D C Finlay; R A Neill; B G Frost
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The naso-temporal division of the monkey's retina.

Authors:  J Stone; J Leicester; S M Sherman
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  The variability of the human striate cortex.

Authors:  G S Brindley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Binocular neurons and cyclopean visually evoked potentials in monkey and man.

Authors:  B Julesz; W Kropfl
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  G F Poggio; B C Motter; S Squatrito; Y Trotter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Visual responses of area 18 neurons in awake, behaving monkey.

Authors:  J S Baizer; D L Robinson; B M Dow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Convergent input from the striate cortex (area 17) to the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  S M Zeki
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-05-07       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  4 in total

1.  Depth-related visually evoked potentials by dynamic random-dot stereograms in humans: negative correlation between the peaks elicited by convergent and divergent disparities.

Authors:  Babür Sahinoğlu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  At what stage of neural processing do perspective depth cues make a difference?

Authors:  Alexandra Séverac Cauquil; Yves Trotter; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Temporal integration differences between crossed and uncrossed stereoscopic mechanisms.

Authors:  R Patterson; R Cayko; G L Short; R Flanagan; L Moe; E Taylor; P Day
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

4.  Determinants of neural responses to disparity in natural scenes.

Authors:  Yiran Duan; Alexandra Yakovleva; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.