Literature DB >> 1591969

Steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from stimulation of visual field quadrants. Optimizing pattern variables for the size of the field to be investigated.

M Bradnam1, D Keating, D Montgomery, A Evans, B Damato, A Cluckie.   

Abstract

The effects of check size and stimulus size were investigated to optimize the steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from pattern-reversal stimulation of the visual field quadrants. Check sizes of 15', 30', 60', 90', 120' and 180' were investigated at a pattern reversal rate of 11.6 per second for field sizes varying from 2 degrees x 2 degrees to 24 degrees x 24 degrees. The visual evoked cortical potentials were recorded from mid occipital, right occipital and left occipital positions. In the inferonasal quadrant, the largest amplitudes were obtained with 30' and 60' check sizes; however, for these check sizes, the visual evoked cortical potential yielded limited additional information for field sizes greater than 4 degrees x 4 degrees and 6 degrees x 6 degrees, respectively. When a field size of 12 degrees x 12 degrees was investigated, a 90' check size was optimal. The results indicated that, with the above recording positions and check sizes of 15' to 120', there is an optimal number of pattern elements, 40 to 100, for stimulation of the inferonasal quadrant. This should be taken into account when a check size is selected to investigate a field quadrant of a particular size. Digital signal processing techniques were applied to analyze the visual evoked cortical potential, and the system shows promise for objective examination of the visual field.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1591969     DOI: 10.1007/bf00156574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  12 in total

1.  Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  M Bach; A Speidel-Fiaux
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.

Authors:  L D Blumhardt; G Barrett; A M Halliday
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Effect of number of elements and size of stimulus field on recordability of pattern reversal visual evoked response.

Authors:  O Katsumi; T Hirose; T Tsukada
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Steady-state evoked potentials.

Authors:  D Regan
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1977-11

5.  Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check-size as a function of retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  M R Harter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Objective perimetry by evoked potential recording: limitations.

Authors:  D Regan; B A Milner
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-03

7.  Visual evoked responses in the assessment of field defects in glaucoma.

Authors:  J M Cappin; S Nissim
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-01

8.  Retinal potentials in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: physiological evidence for temporal frequency tuning deficits.

Authors:  G L Trick
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  The visual evoked potential in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: effects of check size, field size, and stimulation rate.

Authors:  V L Towle; A Moskowitz; S Sokol; B Schwartz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Visual evoked cortical potential to paracentral retinal stimulation in chronic glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and an age-matched group of normals.

Authors:  J W Howe; K W Mitchell
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-06-16       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials.

Authors:  M S Bradnam; D M Montgomery; A L Evans; D Keating; E A McClure; B E Damato; R McFadzean
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A personal computer-based visual evoked potential stimulus and recording system.

Authors:  M S Bradnam; A L Evans; D M Montgomery; D Keating; B E Damato; A Cluckie; D Allan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 3.  What can visual electrophysiology tell about possible visual-field defects in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Siân E Handley; Maja Šuštar; Manca Tekavčič Pompe
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.