Literature DB >> 7790438

Detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci by the Alamar MIC system.

R J Zabransky1, A R Dinuzzo, G L Woods.   

Abstract

The ability of the Alamar microdilution MIC system to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci was evaluated by comparing the results with an agar dilution screen method. Of 100 strains tested, 41 were resistant and 47 were susceptible by both tests. Five strains were intermediate and one was resistant by the Alamar MIC system but susceptible by the agar screen. Three strains each were susceptible or intermediate by the Alamar MIC system but resistant by the agar screen. The predictive values for the Alamar MIC system were 94% (susceptible) and 88% (combined intermediate and resistant). The Alamar MIC system does not appear to have sufficient accuracy for the detection or confirmation of vancomycin resistance in enterococci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7790438      PMCID: PMC228041          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.791-793.1995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  Evidence for clonal spread of a single strain of beta-lactamase-producing Enterococcus (Streptococcus) faecalis to six hospitals in five states.

Authors:  B E Murray; K V Singh; S M Markowitz; H A Lopardo; J E Patterson; M J Zervos; E Rubeglio; G M Eliopoulos; L B Rice; F W Goldstein
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 2.  The life and times of the Enterococcus.

Authors:  B E Murray
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Plasmid-mediated resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  R Leclercq; E Derlot; J Duval; P Courvalin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Detection of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus species.

Authors:  B M Willey; B N Kreiswirth; A E Simor; G Willaims; S R Scriver; A Phillips; D E Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  In vitro susceptibility studies of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  D F Sahm; J Kissinger; M S Gilmore; P R Murray; R Mulder; J Solliday; B Clarke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Ability of clinical laboratories to detect antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  F C Tenover; J Tokars; J Swenson; S Paul; K Spitalny; W Jarvis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of MicroScan rapid panels for detection of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in enterococci.

Authors:  G L Woods; B DiGiovanni; M Levison; P Pitsakis; D LaTemple
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Development of a standardized screening method for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  J M Swenson; N C Clark; M J Ferraro; D F Sahm; G Doern; M A Pfaller; L B Reller; M P Weinstein; R J Zabransky; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Unacceptable performance and the lack of reproducibility results in the report of colorimetric methods for early detection of vancomycin and oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ibrahim C Acuner; Cafer Eroglu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Factors influencing the vitek gram-positive susceptibility system's detection of vanB-encoded vancomycin resistance among enterococci.

Authors:  B Jett; L Free; D F Sahm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of commercial vancomycin agar screen plates for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  K G Van Horn; C A Gedris; K M Rodney; J B Mitchell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of Alamar colorimetric broth microdilution susceptibility testing method for staphylococci and enterococci.

Authors:  C N Baker; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Microplate alamar blue assay versus BACTEC 460 system for high-throughput screening of compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium.

Authors:  L Collins; S G Franzblau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Revised approach for identification and detection of ampicillin and vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus species by using MicroScan panels.

Authors:  P C Iwen; D M Kelly; J Linder; S H Hinrichs
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of agar dilution, broth microdilution, E-test, disk diffusion, and automated Vitek methods for testing susceptibilities of Enterococcus spp. to vancomycin.

Authors:  P C Kohner; R Patel; J R Uhl; K M Garin; M K Hopkins; L T Wegener; F R Cockerill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Resazurin microtiter assay plate: simple and inexpensive method for detection of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Juan-Carlos Palomino; Anandi Martin; Mirtha Camacho; Humberto Guerra; Jean Swings; Françoise Portaels
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Multiple applications of Alamar Blue as an indicator of metabolic function and cellular health in cell viability bioassays.

Authors:  Sephra N Rampersad
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.