Literature DB >> 8349745

Ability of clinical laboratories to detect antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci.

F C Tenover1, J Tokars, J Swenson, S Paul, K Spitalny, W Jarvis.   

Abstract

To test the ability of clinical laboratories to detect antimicrobial resistance among enterococci, we sent four vancomycin-resistant enterococcal strains and one beta-lactamase-producing enterococcus to all 93 nongovernment, hospital-based clinical laboratories in New Jersey; 76 (82%) participated in the study. Each organism was tested by the laboratory's routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing method. The proportion of laboratories that correctly reported that an isolate was resistant to vancomycin varied according to the resistance level of the isolate: high-level resistance (MIC for Enterococcus faecium = 512 micrograms/ml), 96% of laboratories correct; moderate-level resistance (MIC for E. faecium = 64 micrograms/ml), 27% correct; low-level resistance (MIC for Enterococcus faecalis = 32 micrograms/ml), 16% correct; and intrinsic low-level resistance (MIC for Enterococcus gallinarum = 8 micrograms/ml), 74% correct. The beta-lactamase-producing E. faecalis isolate was identified as resistant to penicillin and ampicillin by 66 and 8% of laboratories, respectively, but only three laboratories recognized that it was a beta-lactamase producer. This survey suggests that many laboratories may fail to detect antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8349745      PMCID: PMC265616          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1695-1699.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  23 in total

1.  Bacteremia caused by a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.

Authors:  E Bingen; N Lambert-Zechovsky; P Mariani-Kurkdjian; J P Cezard; J Navarro
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Problems with the disk diffusion test for detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci.

Authors:  J M Swenson; B C Hill; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Plasmid-mediated resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  R Leclercq; E Derlot; J Duval; P Courvalin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level resistance to gentamicin.

Authors:  R G Hindes; S H Willey; G M Eliopoulos; L B Rice; C T Eliopoulos; B E Murray; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Rapid dissemination of beta-lactamase-producing, aminoglycoside-resistant Enterococcus faecalis among patients and staff on an infant-toddler surgical ward.

Authors:  E Rhinehart; N E Smith; C Wennersten; E Gorss; J Freeman; G M Eliopoulos; R C Moellering; D A Goldmann
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  In vitro susceptibility studies of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  D F Sahm; J Kissinger; M S Gilmore; P R Murray; R Mulder; J Solliday; B Clarke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Inducible resistance to vancomycin in Enterococcus faecium D366.

Authors:  R Williamson; S Al-Obeid; J H Shlaes; F W Goldstein; D M Shlaes
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Transferable beta-lactamase. A new mechanism for in vitro penicillin resistance in Streptococcus faecalis.

Authors:  B E Murray; B Mederski-Samaroj
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  The vanB gene of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis V583 is structurally related to genes encoding D-Ala:D-Ala ligases and glycopeptide-resistance proteins VanA and VanC.

Authors:  S Evers; D F Sahm; P Courvalin
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1993-02-14       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  Recovery of resistant enterococci during vancomycin prophylaxis.

Authors:  A H Kaplan; P H Gilligan; R R Facklam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  38 in total

1.  Limitations of vitek GPS-418 cards in exact detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci with the vanB genotype.

Authors:  T Okabe; K Oana; Y Kawakami; M Yamaguchi; Y Takahashi; Y Okimura; T Honda; T Katsuyama
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  Y Cetinkaya; P Falk; C G Mayhall
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Are clinical laboratories in California accurately reporting vancomycin-resistant enterococci?

Authors:  J Rosenberg; F C Tenover; J Wong; W Jarvis; D J Vugia
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Factors influencing the vitek gram-positive susceptibility system's detection of vanB-encoded vancomycin resistance among enterococci.

Authors:  B Jett; L Free; D F Sahm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of glycopeptide resistance genotypes and identification to the species level of clinically relevant enterococci by PCR.

Authors:  S Dutka-Malen; S Evers; P Courvalin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of commercial vancomycin agar screen plates for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  K G Van Horn; C A Gedris; K M Rodney; J B Mitchell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance.

Authors:  N Woodford; A P Johnson; D Morrison; D C Speller
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Comparison of inoculation methods for testing enterococci by using vancomycin screening agar.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; M L McElmeel; C W Trippy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of Alamar colorimetric broth microdilution susceptibility testing method for staphylococci and enterococci.

Authors:  C N Baker; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Resistant enterococci--mechanisms, laboratory detection and control in hospitals.

Authors:  J J Wade; A H Uttley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.