Literature DB >> 8891658

Reorientation of visually evoked postural responses by different eye-in-orbit and head-on-trunk angular positions.

C J Wolsley1, V Sakellari, A M Bronstein.   

Abstract

We examined the question of whether the position of the eyes in the head and of the head on the trunk influence the direction of visually elicited postural reactions. Normal subjects stood on a force platform viewing a large disc, rotating in the roll plane, always maintained orthogonal to the line of sight. The disc was presented at 0 degree, 30 degrees and 90 degrees to the right or left with respect to the mid-frontal plane of the subject's body and was viewed with various combinations of horizontal eye-in-orbit and head-on-trunk deviations. It was found that the main direction of body sway was always reoriented to be parallel to the disc (e.g. viewing the disc at 30 degrees oriented sway responses at a mean angle of 33 degrees). The largest sway responses were obtained when the disc was parallel to the sagittal plane of the body and was viewed with an ipsilateral eye-neck deviation totalling 90 degrees (head-on-trunk 60 degrees+eye-in-orbit 30 degrees). When eye and head deviations cancelled each other (i.e. eye-in-orbit +30 degrees combined with head-on-trunk -30 degrees), directional effects on sway also cancelled each other out. This result demonstrates that signals of eye-in-orbit and head-on-trunk position have the capability to redirect visuo-motor commands to the appropriate postural muscles. This allows vision to regulate postural balance whatever the position of the eyes in space. We speculate that this function is mediated by eye and neck proprioceptive signals (or alternatively by efference copy) with access to gain control mechanisms in the visuo-postural system.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8891658     DOI: 10.1007/bf00227305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  13 in total

1.  Influence of visual and somatosensory input on leg EMG responses in dynamic posturography in normals.

Authors:  D Timmann; C Belting; M Schwarz; H C Diener
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-02

2.  Suppression of visually evoked postural responses.

Authors:  A M Bronstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Moving visual scenes influence the apparent direction of gravity.

Authors:  J Dichgans; R Held; L R Young; T Brandt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The perception of head and neck angular displacement in normal and labyrinthine-defective subjects. A quantitative study using a 'remembered saccade' technique.

Authors:  T Nakamura; A M Bronstein
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Quantification of postural sway in normals and patients with cerebellar diseases.

Authors:  H C Diener; J Dichgans; M Bacher; B Gompf
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-02

6.  Compensation for labyrinthine defects examined by use of a tilting room.

Authors:  W Bles; J M Vianney de Jong; G de Wit
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control.

Authors:  L Nashner; A Berthoz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Visual and graviceptive influences on lower leg EMG activity in humans during brief falls.

Authors:  R W Wicke; C M Oman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visual and vestibular contributions to pitch sway stabilization in the ankle muscles of normals and patients with bilateral peripheral vestibular deficits.

Authors:  J H Allum; C R Pfaltz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effect of gaze on postural responses to neck proprioceptive and vestibular stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Y P Ivanenko; R Grasso; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation.

Authors:  A Kavounoudias; R Roll; J P Roll
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The role of vision in maintaining heading direction: effects of changing gaze and optic flow on human gait.

Authors:  M Schubert; C Bohner; W Berger; M v Sprundel; J E J Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The cerebellum may implement the appropriate coupling of sensory inputs and motor responses: evidence from vestibular physiology.

Authors:  D Manzoni
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Identifying the control of physically and perceptually evoked sway responses with coincident visual scene velocities and tilt of the base of support.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine P Agathos; Delphine Bernardin; Delphine Huchet; Anne-Catherine Scherlen; Christine Assaiante; Brice Isableu
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-06-30

7.  Automatic control of postural sway by visual motion parallax.

Authors:  A M Bronstein; D Buckwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neck muscle vibration makes walking humans accelerate in the direction of gaze.

Authors:  Y P Ivanenko; R Grasso; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Cervical vertigo.

Authors:  T Brandt; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Vestibulo-perceptual influences upon the vestibulo-spinal reflex.

Authors:  Angela N Bonsu; Sofia Nousi; Rhannon Lobo; Paul H Strutton; Qadeer Arshad; Adolfo M Bronstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.