Literature DB >> 7511525

Influence of visual and somatosensory input on leg EMG responses in dynamic posturography in normals.

D Timmann1, C Belting, M Schwarz, H C Diener.   

Abstract

The contribution of visual and somatosensory input to stabilization after sudden postural disturbances was investigated. Fast transient platform movements (50 degrees/sec, 4 degrees), rotating toe-up around the ankle-joint, evoke EMG responses in the triceps surae (TS) and anterior tibial (TA) muscles. The short and medium latency responses (SL, ML) in the TS destabilize, the long latency responses (LL) in the TA stabilize the upright posture. The influence of vision was tested in normals comparing the conditions eyes open with eyes closed. The influence of additional somatosensory input was tested with the operator's index finger touching the back of the subject with eyes closed. Absent visual input (eyes closed) resulted in a decrease in latency of the stabilizing LL response and an increase in the integrated EMG (iEMG). With eyes closed the latency of the LL response decreased by 4 msec on average (mean eyes open: 111.6 msec (S.D. = 17.3), eyes closed: 107.6 msec (S.D. = 17.5); P < 0.001 (Wilcoxon test)), the iEMG increased by 10% (mean eyes open: 13.9 microV.sec (S.D. = 7.6), eyes closed: 15.5 microV.sec (S.D. = 8.6); P < 0.001). Additional somatosensory input as an external reference for body orientation in space resulted in an increase in latency and decrease in iEMG: the latency increased by 7 msec on average (mean eyes closed: 107.6 msec (S.D. = 17.5), index finger and eyes closed: 114.7 msec (S.D. = 19.9); P < 0.001), the iEMG decreased by 20% (mean eyes closed 15.5 microV.sec (S.D. = 8.6), index finger and eyes closed: 12.3 microV.sec (S.D. = 7.5); P < 0.001). There was no significant change in latency of SL and ML. We conclude that postural EMG responses in leg muscles after fast transient platform movements change according to different functional demands, modulated via visual and somatosensory input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7511525     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90085-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  6 in total

1.  The role of neuromuscular changes in aging and knee osteoarthritis on dynamic postural control.

Authors:  Judit Takacs; Mark G Carpenter; S Jayne Garland; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 6.745

2.  Postural responses to changing task conditions in patients with cerebellar lesions.

Authors:  P Mummel; D Timmann; U W Krause; D Boering; A F Thilmann; H C Diener; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Reorientation of visually evoked postural responses by different eye-in-orbit and head-on-trunk angular positions.

Authors:  C J Wolsley; V Sakellari; A M Bronstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Time to reconfigure balancing behaviour in man: changing visual condition while riding a continuously moving platform.

Authors:  Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  [Altered hip muscle activation in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain].

Authors:  D Nötzel; C Puta; H Wagner; C Anders; A Petrovich; H H W Gabriel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 6.  The contribution of small and large sensory afferents to postural control in patients with peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Li Li; Shuqi Zhang; John Dobson
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 7.179

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.