Literature DB >> 8884911

Optimization of noise-equivalent count rates in 3D PET.

R D Badawi1, P K Marsden, B F Cronin, J L Sutcliffe, M N Maisey.   

Abstract

We have used noise-equivalent count (NEC) rates to optimize count rate performance for 3D acquisition in PET in a wide range of situations, with particular reference to imaging of the torso. We have also compared NEC performance for 2D and 3D acquisition in order to establish the conditions under which 3D mode offers an improvement over 2D mode. Measurements were performed on four tissue-equivalent phantoms ranging in size from that of an infant's head (13 cm diameter) to that of an obese adult's chest (37 cm x 48 cm). Count rate data were acquired as a function of phantom size, activity in the field of view, lower energy discriminator level (LLD) and acquisition mode, and NEC rates were derived as a function of these variables. The LLD at which the highest NEC rate is obtained shows a dependence both on phantom size and on the activity in the field of view both for 2D and for 3D acquisition. The relative advantage of 3D mode over 2D mode, at the optimum LLD setting, is also strongly dependent both on activity in the field of view (FOV) and on the phantom size. The main limiting factors for 3D NEC rates are detector dead-time for small phantoms and random coincidences for large phantoms. The 3D NEC rate is more than twice as great as the 2D NEC rate when less than 60 MBq is present in the FOV for all phantoms except the largest, in which case a ratio of two is only achieved for activities less than 25 MBq. For the smallest phantom, 3D/2D NEC ratios of greater than 3.5 are obtained when the activity in the FOV falls below 10 MBq.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8884911     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/9/014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

Review 1.  From PET detectors to PET scanners.

Authors:  John L Humm; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Alberto Del Guerra
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Simulations of the Effect of Collimation on Count Rates of an LSO PET System.

Authors:  Ruth E Schmitz; Paul E Kinahan; Robert L Harrison; Thomas K Lewellen
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Small animal PET: aspects of performance assessment.

Authors:  Simone Weber; Andreas Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  NEC density and liver ROI S/N ratio for image quality control of whole-body FDG-PET scans: comparison with visual assessment.

Authors:  Tetsuro Mizuta; Michio Senda; Terue Okamura; Keishi Kitamura; Yuichi Inaoka; Munehiro Takahashi; Keiichi Matsumoto; Makoto Abe; Yoshihiro Shimonishi; Susumu Shiomi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  History and future technical innovation in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Terry Jones; David Townsend
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-31

6.  Clinical evaluation of 2D versus 3D whole-body PET image quality using a dedicated BGO PET scanner.

Authors:  D Visvikis; D Griffiths; D C Costa; J Bomanji; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Accuracy of 3D acquisition mode for myocardial FDG PET studies using a BGO-based scanner.

Authors:  Arno P van der Weerdt; Ronald Boellaard; Frans C Visser; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging.

Authors:  Tingting Chang; Guoping Chang; John W Clark; Rami H Diab; Eric Rohren; Osama R Mawlawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Acquisition time optimization of positron emission tomography studies by use of a regression function derived from torso cross-sections and noise-equivalent counts.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Kangai; Hideo Onishi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-01-21

Review 10.  Dosage optimization in positron emission tomography: state-of-the-art methods and future prospects.

Authors:  Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Eleni Fokou; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.