Literature DB >> 8881002

Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt).

J Kiessling1, M Schubert, A Archut.   

Abstract

The introduction of programmable as well as non-linear hearing instruments has shown that audiogram-based fitting procedures are inappropriate for meeting the individual needs of hearing aid users with sensorineural loss. Particularly the present and future development of hearing instruments with advanced analog and digital signal processing requires suitable fitting procedures. In this context, we developed an adaptive fitting strategy (ScalAdapt) using category loudness scaling. In this paper the procedure is described and tested using programmable 3-channel AGC instruments. However, it can be modified for any other hearing aid design. The underlying idea is to normalize the aided loudness perception for two input levels, one around the most comfortable level (MCL) and the other just below the uncomfortable level (UCL), as anchor points in each channel by interactive fine-tuning of the fitting parameters (channel gain, compression onset, compression ratio, etc.). The benefits of ScalAdapt have been evaluated by a field test study in 17 experienced hearing aid users. The results showed that ScalAdapt provides consistently higher objective (speech recognition in noise) and subjective benefits (self-assessment inventory) than for instance NAL-based fittings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8881002     DOI: 10.3109/01050399609047998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol        ISSN: 0105-0397


  9 in total

1.  Indication for the need of flexible and frequency specific mapping functions in cochlear implant speech processors.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Comparative studies on hearing aid selection and fitting procedures: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mick Metselaar; Bert Maat; Hans Verschuure; Wouter A Dreschler; Louw Feenstra
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-12

4.  The madsen aurical.

Authors:  J E Baer; J Groth
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-12

Review 5.  Intra- and Intersubject Variability in Audiometric Measures and Loudness Judgments in Older Listeners with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Monica L Hawley; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 6.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

7.  The master hearing aid.

Authors:  James R Curran; Jason A Galster
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-05-17

8.  Auditory and Non-Auditory Contributions for Unaided Speech Recognition in Noise as a Function of Hearing Aid Use.

Authors:  Anja Gieseler; Maike A S Tahden; Christiane M Thiel; Kirsten C Wagener; Markus Meis; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-21

9.  Evaluating hearing performance with cochlear implants within the same patient using daily randomization and imaging-based fitting - The ELEPHANT study.

Authors:  L J G Lambriks; M van Hoof; J A Debruyne; M Janssen; J Chalupper; K A van der Heijden; J R Hof; C A Hellingman; E L J George; E M J Devocht
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.