Literature DB >> 17955254

Comparative studies on hearing aid selection and fitting procedures: a review of the literature.

Mick Metselaar1, Bert Maat, Hans Verschuure, Wouter A Dreschler, Louw Feenstra.   

Abstract

Although a large number of fitting procedures have been developed and are nowadays generally applied in modern hearing aid fitting technology, little is known about their effectiveness in comparison with each other. This paper argues the need for comparative validation studies on hearing aid fitting procedures based on the design of a randomized clinical trial and carried out in a large-scale clinical population. These studies are hard to conduct but can provide detailed information on the various aspects of the rehabilitation with hearing aids. The design of several recently reported comparative studies of hearing aid fitting procedures will be reviewed. This gives rise to a number of comments on aspects like, study design, composition of the study population and definition of outcome measures rather than on the outcome or conclusions of these studies themselves.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17955254     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0494-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  40 in total

1.  The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices.

Authors:  L E Cornelisse; R C Seewald; D G Jamieson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Development and evaluation of a procedure for fitting multi-channel compression hearing aids.

Authors:  B C Moore; J I Alcántara; B R Glasberg
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1998-06

3.  Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt).

Authors:  J Kiessling; M Schubert; A Archut
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1996

4.  Attitude and help-seeking for hearing impairment.

Authors:  R H van den Brink; H P Wit; G I Kempen; M J van Heuvelen
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1996-10

5.  Ability to achieve gain/frequency response and SSPL-90 under three prescription formulas with in-the-ear hearing aids.

Authors:  C A Sammeth; B F Peek; G W Bratt; F H Bess; S M Amberg
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise.

Authors:  B Hagerman
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1984

7.  The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults.

Authors:  Dayna S Dalton; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Terry L Wiley; David M Nondahl
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2003-10

8.  Comparison of an 'intuitive' NHS hearing aid prescription method with DSL 4.1 targets for amplification.

Authors:  Jonathan O Parsons; Charles R Clark
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?

Authors:  Karolina Smeds
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Comparison of two adaptive procedures for fitting a multi-channel compression hearing aid.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Josephine Marriage; José Alcántara; Brian R Glasberg
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.