Literature DB >> 8878686

Large genetic change at small fitness cost in large populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for wind tunnel flight: rethinking fitness surfaces.

K E Weber1.   

Abstract

The fitness effects of extreme genetic change by selection were studied in large populations subjected to prolonged, intense selection. Two replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster, with estimated effective sizes 500 < or = Ne < or = 1000, were selected for increased performance in a wind tunnel, selecting on average the fastest 4.5% of flies. The mean apparent flying speed of both lines increased from approximately 2 to 170 cm/sec and continued to respond at diminishing rates, without reaching a plateau, for 100 generations. Competitive fitness tests in generations 50 and 85 showed minimal or no fitness loss in selected lines compared to controls. Sublines relaxed in generations 65 and 85 showed minimal or no regression in apparent flying speed. Hybrid lines, from a cross of selected x control lines in generation 75, responded to reselection saltationally, showing that the chromosomes of the selected lines had been assembled from alleles at many loci, from many different chromosomes in the base population. Thus, major genetic change was achieved, but without the costs usually associated with strong directional selection. Large population size has been interpreted, in opposing models, as either a brake or an accelerator in its effects on long-term change by selection. These results favor the second model, and challenge the concept of rugged fitness surfaces underlying the first model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8878686      PMCID: PMC1207494     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  9 in total

1.  Increased selection response in larger populations. I. Selection for wing-tip height in Drosophila melanogaster at three population sizes.

Authors:  K E Weber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1931-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic Analysis of a "Plateaued" Population of Drosophila Melanogaster.

Authors:  W P Brown; A E Bell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Conservation genetics.

Authors:  R Frankham
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  The rate of polygenic mutation.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  The selection limit due to the conflict between truncation and stabilizing selection with mutation.

Authors:  Z B Zeng; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The effects of population size and selection intesnity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. II. Long-term response to selection.

Authors:  L P Jones; R Frankham; J S Barker
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse. I. The limits attained in earlier experiments.

Authors:  R C Roberts
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

  9 in total
  16 in total

1.  Genetic variation for total fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: complex yet replicable patterns.

Authors:  Michael P Gardner; Kevin Fowler; Nicholas H Barton; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Quantitative genetics of functional characters in Drosophila melanogaster populations subjected to laboratory selection.

Authors:  Henrique Teotónio; Margarida Matos; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Microarray analysis of replicate populations selected against a wing-shape correlation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kenneth E Weber; Ralph J Greenspan; David R Chicoine; Katia Fiorentino; Mary H Thomas; Theresa L Knight
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Quantitative genetics, version 3.0: where have we gone since 1987 and where are we headed?

Authors:  Bruce Walsh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Inbreeding depression and male survivorship in Drosophila: implications for senescence theory.

Authors:  William R Swindell; Juan L Bouzat
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. VI. Environmental constraints on adaptation and divergence.

Authors:  M Travisano
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: a selective review of modelling issues.

Authors:  P Bijma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Evolutionary divergence of the genetic architecture underlying photoperiodism in the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii.

Authors:  K P Lair; W E Bradshaw; C M Holzapfel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  How does epistasis influence the response to selection?

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Incongruent fitness landscapes, not tradeoffs, dominate the adaptation of vesicular stomatitis virus to novel host types.

Authors:  Sarah D Smith-Tsurkan; Claus O Wilke; Isabel S Novella
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 3.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.