Literature DB >> 2116358

Increased selection response in larger populations. I. Selection for wing-tip height in Drosophila melanogaster at three population sizes.

K E Weber1.   

Abstract

The effect of population size on selection response was investigated with replicated selection lines of 40, 200 and 1000 selected parents, using Drosophila melanogaster homozygous for the mutant raised. Selection for increased wing-tip height was carried out for 55 generations, with an average selection intensity of 0.6 standard deviation. The rank order of responses in the seven individual lines was significantly in order of population size, and the variance of response among lines showed a significant effect of population size. The final mean responses (selected - controls, +/- standard errors) in the three treatments, in order of increasing population size, were 8.6 +/- 1.8 mils (three small lines), 15.1 +/- 1.3 mils (two medium lines), and 19.8 +/- 1.5 mils (two large lines). The differences between treatments seem to have emerged too rapidly to be the result of mutations, and are probably due mainly to the utilization of existing variation with greater efficiency by selection in larger populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2116358      PMCID: PMC1204084     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  12 in total

1.  Population size and selection intensity effects on long-term selection response in mice.

Authors:  E J Eisen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  EFFECTS OF FINITE SIZE ON SELECTION ADVANCE IN SIMULATED GENETIC POPULATIONS.

Authors:  J L GILL
Journal:  Aust J Biol Sci       Date:  1965-06

3.  Selection and body size in Drosophila pseudoobscura at different temperatures.

Authors:  M DRUGER
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Models of long-term artificial selection in finite population with recurrent mutation.

Authors:  W G Hill; J Rasbash
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Effects of population size and selection intensity of short-term response to selection for postweaning gain in mice.

Authors:  J P Hanrahan; E J Eisen; J E Lagates
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The effects of population size and selection intesnity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. II. Long-term response to selection.

Authors:  L P Jones; R Frankham; J S Barker
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. I. Short-term response to selection.

Authors:  R Frankham; L P Jones; J S Barker
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  STUDIES ON NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA. II. HERITABILITY AND RESPONSE TO SELECTION FOR WING LENGTH IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND D. SIMULANS AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES.

Authors:  A O TANTAWY; G S MALLAH; H R TEWFIK
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  18 in total

1.  Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Increased selection response in larger populations. II. Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster at two population sizes.

Authors:  K E Weber; L T Diggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Selection on wing allometry in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K E Weber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Three types of rescue can avert extinction in a changing environment.

Authors:  Ruth A Hufbauer; Marianna Szűcs; Emily Kasyon; Courtney Youngberg; Michael J Koontz; Christopher Richards; Ty Tuff; Brett A Melbourne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Quantitative genetics of postponed aging in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Analysis of outbred populations.

Authors:  E W Hutchinson; M R Rose
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Inbreeding depression and male survivorship in Drosophila: implications for senescence theory.

Authors:  William R Swindell; Juan L Bouzat
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  How diversification rates and diversity limits combine to create large-scale species-area relationships.

Authors:  Yael Kisel; Lynsey McInnes; Nicola H Toomey; C David L Orme
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Large genetic change at small fitness cost in large populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for wind tunnel flight: rethinking fitness surfaces.

Authors:  K E Weber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Evolutionary rescue beyond the models.

Authors:  Richard Gomulkiewicz; Ruth G Shaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Artificial selection and maintenance of genetic variance in the global dairy cow population.

Authors:  S Brotherstone; M Goddard
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.