Literature DB >> 3803917

The selection limit due to the conflict between truncation and stabilizing selection with mutation.

Z B Zeng, W G Hill.   

Abstract

Long-term selection response could slow down from a decline in genetic variance or in selection differential or both. A model of conflict between truncation and stabilizing selection in infinite population size is analysed in terms of the reduction in selection differential. Under the assumption of a normal phenotypic distribution, the limit to selection is found to be a function of kappa, the intensity of truncation selection, omega 2, a measure of the intensity of stabilizing selection, and sigma 2, the phenotypic variance of the character. The maintenance of genetic variation at this limit is also analyzed in terms of mutation-selection balance by the use of the "House-of-cards" approximation. It is found that truncation selection can substantially reduce the equilibrium genetic variance below that when only stabilizing selection is acting, and the proportional reduction in variance is greatest when the selection is very weak. When truncation selection is strong, any further increase in the strength of selection has little further influence on the variance. It appears that this mutation-selection balance is insufficient to account for the high levels of genetic variation observed in many long-term selection experiments.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3803917      PMCID: PMC1203042     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  7 in total

1.  Conflict between directional and centripetal selection.

Authors:  J W JAMES
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  STABLE EQUILIBRIA FOR THE OPTIMUM MODEL.

Authors:  K Kojima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1959-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic Analysis of a "Plateaued" Population of Drosophila Melanogaster.

Authors:  W P Brown; A E Bell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Attenuation of genetic progress under continued selection in poultry.

Authors:  M LERNER; E R DEMPSTER
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1951-04       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Variation for metrical characters in drosophila populations. 3. The nature of selection.

Authors:  R Linney; B W Barnes; M J Kearsey
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Selection for a threshold character in Drosophila. II. Homeostatic behaviour on relaxation of selection.

Authors:  B D Latter
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 1.588

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T F Mackay; R F Lyman; M S Jackson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Large genetic change at small fitness cost in large populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for wind tunnel flight: rethinking fitness surfaces.

Authors:  K E Weber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Selection response in finite populations.

Authors:  M Wei; A Caballero; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Walking through the statistical black boxes of plant breeding.

Authors:  Alencar Xavier; William M Muir; Bruce Craig; Katy Martin Rainey
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: non-linear divergence among unselected strains.

Authors:  T F Mackay; R F Lyman; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what, me normal?

Authors:  M Turelli; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: estimates from response to selection of inbred strains.

Authors:  T F Mackay; J D Fry; R F Lyman; S V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Long-term impact of conventional and optimal contribution conservation methods on genetic diversity and genetic gain in local pig breeds.

Authors:  Qingbo Zhao; Huiming Liu; Qamar Raza Qadri; Qishan Wang; Yuchun Pan; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.821

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.