Literature DB >> 18245369

Microarray analysis of replicate populations selected against a wing-shape correlation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Kenneth E Weber1, Ralph J Greenspan, David R Chicoine, Katia Fiorentino, Mary H Thomas, Theresa L Knight.   

Abstract

We selected bidirectionally to change the phenotypic correlation between two wing dimensions in Drosophila melanogaster and measured gene expression differences in late third instar wing disks, using microarrays. We tested an array of 12 selected lines, including 10 from a Massachusetts population (5 divergently selected pairs) and 2 from a California population (1 divergently selected pair). In the Massachusetts replicates, 29 loci showed consistent, significant expression differences in all 5 line-pair comparisons. However, the significant loci in the California lines were almost completely different from these. The disparity between responding genes in different gene pools confirms recent evidence that surprisingly large numbers of loci can affect wing shape. Our results also show that with well-replicated selection lines, of large effective size, the numbers of candidate genes in microarray-based searches can be reduced to realistic levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18245369      PMCID: PMC2248358          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.078014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  54 in total

1.  Quantitative trait loci affecting components of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E Zimmerman; A Palsson; G Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Identification of genes involved in Drosophila melanogaster geotaxis, a complex behavioral trait.

Authors:  Daniel P Toma; Kevin P White; Jerry Hirsch; Ralph J Greenspan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-06-03       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Artificial selection for high activity favors mighty mini-muscles in house mice.

Authors:  Philippe Houle-Leroy; Helga Guderley; John G Swallow; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations.

Authors:  Marjorie F Oleksiak; Gary A Churchill; Douglas L Crawford
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  Updating the 'crop circle'.

Authors:  Katrien M Devos
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.834

6.  Control of growth and positional information by the graded vestigial expression pattern in the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L A Baena-Lopez; A García-Bellido
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genetic divergence under uniform selection. II. Different responses to selection for knockdown resistance to ethanol among Drosophila melanogaster populations and their replicate lines.

Authors:  F M Cohan; A A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Plant comparative genetics after 10 years.

Authors:  M D Gale; K M Devos
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-beta signaling contributes to variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ian Dworkin; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Expression profiling of Drosophila imaginal discs.

Authors:  Ansgar Klebes; Brian Biehs; Francisco Cifuentes; Thomas B Kornberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-07-24       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  5 in total

1.  How to run far: multiple solutions and sex-specific responses to selective breeding for high voluntary activity levels.

Authors:  Theodore Garland; Scott A Kelly; Jessica L Malisch; Erik M Kolb; Robert M Hannon; Brooke K Keeney; Shana L Van Cleave; Kevin M Middleton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A genome-wide gene function prediction resource for Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Han Yan; Kavitha Venkatesan; John E Beaver; Niels Klitgord; Muhammed A Yildirim; Tong Hao; David E Hill; Michael E Cusick; Norbert Perrimon; Frederick P Roth; Marc Vidal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Identification of genetic suppressors of the Sin3A knockdown wing phenotype.

Authors:  Aishwarya Swaminathan; Valerie L Barnes; Stephanie Fox; Sarah Gammouh; Lori A Pile
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genetic basis of wing morphogenesis in Drosophila: sexual dimorphism and non-allometric effects of shape variation.

Authors:  Valeria P Carreira; Ignacio M Soto; Julián Mensch; Juan J Fanara
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 1.978

5.  Evolution of sex-specific wing shape at the widerwing locus in four species of Nasonia.

Authors:  D W Loehlin; L S Enders; J H Werren
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.821

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.