Literature DB >> 8878572

Bacterial biofilms and the bioelectric effect.

N Wellman1, S M Fortun, B R McLeod.   

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms are acknowledged to be a major factor in problems of ineffective sterilization often encountered in clinics, hospitals, and industrial processes. There have been indications that the addition of a relatively small direct current electric field with the sterilant used to combat the biofilm greatly increases the efficacy of the sterilization process. The results of the experiments reported in this paper support the concept of the "bioelectric effect" as reported by J.W. Costerton, B. Ellis, K. Lam, F. Johnson, and A.E. Khoury (Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 38:2803-2809, 1994). With a current of 1 mA flowing through the chamber containing the biofilm, an increase in the killing of the bacteria of about 8 log orders was observed at the end of 24 h (compared with the control with the same amount of antibacterial agent but no current). We also confirmed that the current alone does not affect the biofilm and that there appear to be optimum levels of both the current and the sterilant that are needed to obtain the maximum effect.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8878572      PMCID: PMC163464     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  8 in total

Review 1.  Establishment of aging biofilms: possible mechanism of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  H Anwar; J L Strap; J W Costerton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy, and stringent response.

Authors:  P Gilbert; P J Collier; M R Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Mechanism of electrical enhancement of efficacy of antibiotics in killing biofilm bacteria.

Authors:  J W Costerton; B Ellis; K Lam; F Johnson; A E Khoury
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Resistance of bacterial biofilms to antibiotics: a growth-rate related effect?

Authors:  M R Brown; D G Allison; P Gilbert
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 5.  Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.

Authors:  J W Costerton; K J Cheng; G G Geesey; T I Ladd; J C Nickel; M Dasgupta; T J Marrie
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 6.  Microbial biofilms.

Authors:  J W Costerton; Z Lewandowski; D E Caldwell; D R Korber; H M Lappin-Scott
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 15.500

7.  Tobramycin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells growing as a biofilm on urinary catheter material.

Authors:  J C Nickel; I Ruseska; J B Wright; J W Costerton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The effect of electrical currents and tobramycin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  J Jass; J W Costerton; H M Lappin-Scott
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol       Date:  1995-09
  8 in total
  27 in total

1.  Photomechanical drug delivery into bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  N S Soukos; S S Socransky; S E Mulholland; S Lee; A G Doukas
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Biofilm consortia on biomedical and biological surfaces: delivery and targeting strategies.

Authors:  V Sihorkar; S P Vyas
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  A radio frequency electric current enhances antibiotic efficacy against bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  R Caubet; F Pedarros-Caubet; M Chu; E Freye; M de Belém Rodrigues; J M Moreau; W J Ellison
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Assessment of the ability of the bioelectric effect to eliminate mixed-species biofilms.

Authors:  Mark E Shirtliff; Alex Bargmeyer; Anne K Camper
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Engineering approaches for the detection and control of orthopaedic biofilm infections.

Authors:  Garth D Ehrlich; Paul Stoodley; Sandeep Kathju; Yongjun Zhao; Bruce R McLeod; Naomi Balaban; Fen Ze Hu; Nicholas G Sotereanos; J William Costerton; Philip S Stewart; J Christopher Post; Qiao Lin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Microbial growth inhibition by alternating electric fields.

Authors:  Moshe Giladi; Yaara Porat; Alexandra Blatt; Yoram Wasserman; Eilon D Kirson; Erez Dekel; Yoram Palti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Electrolytic generation of oxygen partially explains electrical enhancement of tobramycin efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.

Authors:  P S Stewart; W Wattanakaroon; L Goodrum; S M Fortun; B R McLeod
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Effects of slime produced by clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci on activities of various antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  M Souli; H Giamarellou
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Influence of electric fields and pH on biofilm structure as related to the bioelectric effect.

Authors:  P Stoodley; D deBeer; H M Lappin-Scott
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  The electricidal effect: reduction of Staphylococcus and pseudomonas biofilms by prolonged exposure to low-intensity electrical current.

Authors:  Jose L del Pozo; Mark S Rouse; Jayawant N Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.