Literature DB >> 9925521

Electrolytic generation of oxygen partially explains electrical enhancement of tobramycin efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.

P S Stewart1, W Wattanakaroon, L Goodrum, S M Fortun, B R McLeod.   

Abstract

The role of electrolysis products, including protons, hydroxyl ions, reactive oxygen intermediates, oxygen, hydrogen, and heat, in mediating electrical enhancement of killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by tobramycin (the bioelectric effect) was investigated. The log reduction in biofilm viable cell numbers compared to the numbers for the untreated positive control effected by antibiotic increased from 2.88 in the absence of electric current to 5.58 in the presence of electric current. No enhancement of antibiotic efficacy was observed when the buffer composition was changed to simulate the reduced pH that prevails during electrolysis. Neither did stabilization of the pH during electrical treatment by increasing the buffer strength eliminate the bioelectric effect. The temperature increase measured in our experiments, less than 0.2 degree C, was far too small to account for the greatly enhanced antibiotic efficacy. The addition of sodium thiosulfate, an agent capable of rapidly neutralizing reactive oxygen intermediates, did not abolish electrical enhancement of killing. The bioelectric effect persisted when all of the ionic constituents of the medium except the two phosphate buffer components were omitted. This renders the possibility of electrochemical generation of an inhibitory ion, such as nitrite from nitrate, an unlikely explanation for electrical enhancement. The one plausible explanation for the bioelectric effect revealed by this study was the increased delivery of oxygen to the biofilm due to electrolysis. When gaseous oxygen was bubbled into the treatment chamber during exposure to tobramycin (without electric current), a 1.8-log enhancement of killing resulted. The enhancement of antibiotic killing by oxygen was not due simply to physical disturbances caused by sparging the gas because similar delivery of gaseous hydrogen caused no enhancement whatsoever.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9925521      PMCID: PMC89066     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  16 in total

1.  Prevention and control of bacterial infections associated with medical devices.

Authors:  A E Khoury; K Lam; B Ellis; J W Costerton
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1992 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  Electrical enhancement of biocide efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  S A Blenkinsopp; A E Khoury; J W Costerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of the Pour, Spread, and Drop Plate Methods for Enumeration of Rhizobium spp. in Inoculants Made from Presterilized Peat.

Authors:  H J Hoben; P Somasegaran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Mechanism of electrical enhancement of efficacy of antibiotics in killing biofilm bacteria.

Authors:  J W Costerton; B Ellis; K Lam; F Johnson; A E Khoury
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Sensitivity of biofilms to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  M R Brown; P Gilbert
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1993

6.  Alteration of effectiveness of antibiotics by anaerobiosis.

Authors:  R M Verklin; G L Mandell
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1977-01

7.  Augmentation of mass transfer through electrical means for hydrogel-entrapped Escherichia coli cultivation.

Authors:  Y H Chang; A J Grodzinsky; D I Wang
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1995-10-20       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Effects of growth temperature on alginate synthesis and enzymes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa variants.

Authors:  J H Leitão; A M Fialho; I Sá-Correia
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1992-03

9.  Increased minimum inhibitory concentrations with anaerobiasis for tobramycin, gentamicin, and amikacin, compared to latamoxef, piperacillin, chloramphenicol, and clindamycin.

Authors:  K J Tack; L D Sabath
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.544

10.  The effect of electrical currents and tobramycin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  J Jass; J W Costerton; H M Lappin-Scott
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol       Date:  1995-09
View more
  31 in total

1.  Delayed wound healing in diabetic (db/db) mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm challenge: a model for the study of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Ge Zhao; Phillip C Hochwalt; Marcia L Usui; Robert A Underwood; Pradeep K Singh; Garth A James; Philip S Stewart; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Microbial growth inhibition by alternating electric fields in mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection.

Authors:  Moshe Giladi; Yaara Porat; Alexandra Blatt; Esther Shmueli; Yoram Wasserman; Eilon D Kirson; Yoram Palti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A radio frequency electric current enhances antibiotic efficacy against bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  R Caubet; F Pedarros-Caubet; M Chu; E Freye; M de Belém Rodrigues; J M Moreau; W J Ellison
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Assessment of the ability of the bioelectric effect to eliminate mixed-species biofilms.

Authors:  Mark E Shirtliff; Alex Bargmeyer; Anne K Camper
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Engineering approaches for the detection and control of orthopaedic biofilm infections.

Authors:  Garth D Ehrlich; Paul Stoodley; Sandeep Kathju; Yongjun Zhao; Bruce R McLeod; Naomi Balaban; Fen Ze Hu; Nicholas G Sotereanos; J William Costerton; Philip S Stewart; J Christopher Post; Qiao Lin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Microbial growth inhibition by alternating electric fields.

Authors:  Moshe Giladi; Yaara Porat; Alexandra Blatt; Yoram Wasserman; Eilon D Kirson; Erez Dekel; Yoram Palti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Microampere Electric Current Causes Bacterial Membrane Damage and Two-Way Leakage in a Short Period of Time.

Authors:  Venkata Rao Krishnamurthi; Ariel Rogers; Janet Peifer; Isabelle I Niyonshuti; Jingyi Chen; Yong Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Electrochemical biofilm control: mechanism of action.

Authors:  Ozlem Istanbullu; Jerome Babauta; Hung Duc Nguyen; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.209

9.  The electricidal effect: reduction of Staphylococcus and pseudomonas biofilms by prolonged exposure to low-intensity electrical current.

Authors:  Jose L del Pozo; Mark S Rouse; Jayawant N Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Electrochemical biofilm control: a review.

Authors:  Sujala T Sultana; Jerome T Babauta; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.