Literature DB >> 15561841

A radio frequency electric current enhances antibiotic efficacy against bacterial biofilms.

R Caubet1, F Pedarros-Caubet, M Chu, E Freye, M de Belém Rodrigues, J M Moreau, W J Ellison.   

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms are notably resistant to antibiotic prophylaxis. The concentration of antibiotic necessary to significantly reduce the number of bacteria in the biofilm matrix can be several hundred times the MIC for the same bacteria in a planktonic phase. It has been observed that the addition of a weak continuous direct electric current to the liquid surrounding the biofilm can dramatically increase the efficacy of the antibiotic. This phenomenon, known as the bioelectric effect, has only been partially elucidated, and it is not certain that the electrical parameters are optimal. We confirm here the bioelectric effect for Escherichia coli biofilms treated with gentamicin and with oxytetracycline, and we report a new bioelectric effect with a radio frequency alternating electric current (10 MHz) instead of the usual direct current. None of the proposed explanations (transport of ions within the biofilm, production of additional biocides by electrolysis, etc.) of the direct current bioelectric effect are applicable to the radio frequency bioelectric effect. We suggest that this new phenomenon may be due to a specific action of the radio frequency electromagnetic field upon the polar parts of the molecules forming the biofilm matrix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15561841      PMCID: PMC529182          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4662-4664.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  18 in total

1.  Ultrasonic enhancement of antibiotic action on Escherichia coli biofilms: an in vivo model.

Authors:  A M Rediske; B L Roeder; M K Brown; J L Nelson; R L Robison; D O Draper; G B Schaalje; R A Robison; W G Pitt
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents.

Authors:  David Davies
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Prevention and control of bacterial infections associated with medical devices.

Authors:  A E Khoury; K Lam; B Ellis; J W Costerton
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1992 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Electrical enhancement of Streptococcus gordonii biofilm killing by gentamicin.

Authors:  W Wattanakaroon; P S Stewart
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.633

5.  Electrical enhancement of biocide efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  S A Blenkinsopp; A E Khoury; J W Costerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Electrolytic generation of oxygen partially explains electrical enhancement of tobramycin efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.

Authors:  P S Stewart; W Wattanakaroon; L Goodrum; S M Fortun; B R McLeod
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Surface-associated growth.

Authors:  D C Ellwood; C W Keevil; P D Marsh; C M Brown; J N Wardell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-06-11       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Correlation between in vivo and in vitro efficacy of antimicrobial agents against foreign body infections.

Authors:  A F Widmer; R Frei; Z Rajacic; W Zimmerli
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Quantification, qualification, and microbial killing efficiencies of antimicrobial chlorine-based substances produced by iontophoresis.

Authors:  C P Davis; M E Shirtliff; N M Trieff; S L Hoskins; M M Warren
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonizing a urinary catheter in vitro.

Authors:  J C Nickel; J B Wright; I Ruseska; T J Marrie; C Whitfield; J W Costerton
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  22 in total

1.  Microbial growth inhibition by alternating electric fields in mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection.

Authors:  Moshe Giladi; Yaara Porat; Alexandra Blatt; Esther Shmueli; Yoram Wasserman; Eilon D Kirson; Yoram Palti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Engineering approaches for the detection and control of orthopaedic biofilm infections.

Authors:  Garth D Ehrlich; Paul Stoodley; Sandeep Kathju; Yongjun Zhao; Bruce R McLeod; Naomi Balaban; Fen Ze Hu; Nicholas G Sotereanos; J William Costerton; Philip S Stewart; J Christopher Post; Qiao Lin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Microbial growth inhibition by alternating electric fields.

Authors:  Moshe Giladi; Yaara Porat; Alexandra Blatt; Yoram Wasserman; Eilon D Kirson; Erez Dekel; Yoram Palti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Microampere Electric Current Causes Bacterial Membrane Damage and Two-Way Leakage in a Short Period of Time.

Authors:  Venkata Rao Krishnamurthi; Ariel Rogers; Janet Peifer; Isabelle I Niyonshuti; Jingyi Chen; Yong Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Magnetic nanoparticle targeted hyperthermia of cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Min-Ho Kim; Itsukyo Yamayoshi; Steven Mathew; Hubert Lin; Joseph Nayfach; Scott I Simon
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Disposable Patterned Electroceutical Dressing (PED-10) Is Safe for Treatment of Open Clinical Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Sashwati Roy; Shaurya Prakash; Shomita S Mathew-Steiner; Piya Das Ghatak; Varun Lochab; Travis H Jones; Prashanth Mohana Sundaram; Gayle M Gordillo; Vish V Subramaniam; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Nanoparticle-Based Therapies for Wound Biofilm Infection: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Min-Ho Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.935

8.  The electricidal effect: reduction of Staphylococcus and pseudomonas biofilms by prolonged exposure to low-intensity electrical current.

Authors:  Jose L del Pozo; Mark S Rouse; Jayawant N Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Bioelectric effect and bacterial biofilms. A systematic review.

Authors:  J L Del Pozo; M S Rouse; R Patel
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.595

10.  Effect of electrical current on the activities of antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.

Authors:  Jose L del Pozo; Mark S Rouse; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Marta Fernandez Sampedro; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.