Literature DB >> 8872790

Physicians' reasons for failing to comply with computerized preventive care guidelines.

D K Litzelman1, W M Tierney.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess reasons for physicians' noncompliance with computer-generated preventive care reminders. In an academic general internal medicine practice, a survey of physicians' reasons for noncompliance found that 55% of reminders were not complied with. Reasons included "not applicable" in 22.6% (test done elsewhere, patient too ill, no uterus), "next visit" in 22.5% (physician too busy, patient too ill), and "patient refuses" in 9.9% (test not necessary or too costly, patient too busy or fears result). We conclude that although noncompliance with reminders is sometimes appropriate, making time for prevention and patient education may augment preventive care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8872790     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  12 in total

1.  The periodic health examination. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The Regenstrief Medical Record System: 20 years of experience in hospitals, clinics, and neighborhood health centers.

Authors:  C J McDonald; W M Tierney; J M Overhage; D K Martin; G A Wilson
Journal:  MD Comput       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug

3.  Change in American Cancer Society Checkup Guidelines for detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  D J Fink
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Patterns of use of mammography among inner-city Detroit women: contrasts between a health department, HMO, and private hospital.

Authors:  R C Burack; P A Gimotty; W Stengle; L Warbasse; A Moncrease
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Black Americans' attitudes toward cancer and cancer tests: highlights of a study.

Authors: 
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  The lifetime health-monitoring program. A practical approach to preventive medicine.

Authors:  L Breslow; A R Somers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols.

Authors:  D K Litzelman; R S Dittus; M E Miller; W M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial.

Authors:  C J McDonald; S L Hui; D M Smith; W M Tierney; S J Cohen; M Weinberger; G P McCabe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Practice randomization and clinical research. The Indiana experience.

Authors:  W M Tierney; M E Miller; S L Hui; C J McDonald
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers.

Authors:  B K Rimer; M K Keintz; H B Kessler; P F Engstrom; J R Rosan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  How to improve colon cancer screening rates.

Authors:  Luiz Ronaldo Alberti; Diego Paim Carvalho Garcia; Debora Lucciola Coelho; David Correa Alves De Lima; Andy Petroianu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

2.  Prescribers' responses to alerts during medication ordering in the long term care setting.

Authors:  James Judge; Terry S Field; Martin DeFlorio; Jane Laprino; Jill Auger; Paula Rochon; David W Bates; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Reasons for declining computerized insulin protocol recommendations: application of a framework.

Authors:  K Sward; J Orme; D Sorenson; L Baumann; A H Morris
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Long-term changes in compliance with clinical guidelines through computer-based reminders.

Authors:  M M Morgan; J Goodson; G O Barnett
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

5.  Online practice guidelines: issues, obstacles, and future prospects.

Authors:  R D Zielstorff
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Demonstrating the effects of an IAIMS on health care quality and cost.

Authors:  W M Tierney; J M Overhage; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Clinical practice guidelines in practice and education.

Authors:  A O Berg; D Atkins; W Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Computer-generated reminders and quality of pediatric HIV care in a resource-limited setting.

Authors:  Martin C Were; Winstone M Nyandiko; Kristin T L Huang; James E Slaven; Changyu Shen; William M Tierney; Rachel C Vreeman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Type 2 diabetes in family practice. Room for improvement.

Authors:  Stewart B Harris; Moira Stewart; Judith Belle Brown; Stephen Wetmore; Catherine Faulds; Susan Webster-Bogaert; Sheila Porter
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care.

Authors:  Nikki Rousseau; Elaine McColl; John Newton; Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin Eccles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.