Literature DB >> 8320575

Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols.

D K Litzelman1, R S Dittus, M E Miller, W M Tierney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve compliance with computer-generated reminders to perform fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), mammography, and cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) testing.
DESIGN: Six-month prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: Academic primary care general internal medicine practice.
SUBJECTS: Thirty-one general internal medicine faculty, 145 residents, and 5,407 patients with scheduled visits who were eligible for any of the three cancer screening protocols. INTERVENTION: Primary care teams of internal medicine residents and faculty received either routine computer reminders (control) or the same remainders to which they were required to circle one of four responses: 1) "done/order today," 2) "not applicable to this patient," 3) "patient refused," or 4) "next visit."
RESULTS: Intervention physicians complied more frequently than control physicians with all remainders combined (46% vs 38%, respectively, p = 0.002) and separately with remainders for FOBT (61% vs 49%, p = 0.0007) and mammography (54% vs 47%, p = 0.036) but not cervical Pap testing (21% vs 18%, p = 0.2). Intervention residents responded significantly more often than control residents to all reminders together and separately to reminders for FOBT and mammography but not Pap testing. There was no significant difference between intervention and control faculty, but the compliance rate for control faculty was significantly higher than the rate for control residents for all reminders together and separately for FOBT but not mammography or Pap testing. The intervention's effect was greatest for patients > or = 70 years old, with significant results for all tests, together and singly, for residents but not faculty. Intervention physicians felt that the reminders were not applicable 21% of the time (due to inadequate data in patient's electronic medical records) and stated that their patients refused 10% of the time.
CONCLUSIONS: Requiring physicians to respond to computer-generated reminders improved their compliance with preventive care protocols, especially for elderly patients for whom control physicians' compliance was the lowest. However, 100% compliance with cancer screening remainders will be unattainable due to incomplete data and patient refusal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8320575     DOI: 10.1007/bf02600144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  24 in total

1.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

2.  Papanicolaou testing -- are we screening the wrong women?

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-01-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Quality assurance and computer-based patient records.

Authors:  G O Barnett; R N Winickoff
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  S J McPhee; J A Bird; D Fordham; J E Rodnick; E H Osborn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991 Jul 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Achieving the national health objective for influenza immunization: success of an institution-wide vaccination program.

Authors:  K L Nichol; J E Korn; K L Margolis; G A Poland; R A Petzel; R P Lofgren
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W M Tierney; M E Miller; C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Computerized display of past test results. Effect on outpatient testing.

Authors:  W M Tierney; C J McDonald; D K Martin; M P Rogers
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial.

Authors:  C J McDonald; S L Hui; D M Smith; W M Tierney; S J Cohen; M Weinberger; G P McCabe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Practice randomization and clinical research. The Indiana experience.

Authors:  W M Tierney; M E Miller; S L Hui; C J McDonald
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Screening procedures in the asymptomatic adult. Comparison of physicians' recommendations, patients' desires, published guidelines, and actual practice.

Authors:  B Woo; B Woo; E F Cook; M Weisberg; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-09-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care.

Authors:  M E Hulscher; M Wensing; R P Grol; T van der Weijden; C van Weel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; Y Liaw; C A Brandt; G J Corb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Measurement-based care for unipolar depression.

Authors:  David W Morris; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The continuing evolution of women's health.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Joan Neuner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Physicians, information technology, and health care systems: a journey, not a destination.

Authors:  Clement J McDonald; J Marc Overhage; Burke W Mamlin; Paul D Dexter; William M Tierney
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

8.  An electronic prompt in dispensing software to promote clinical interventions by community pharmacists: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  James F Reeve; Peter C Tenni; Gregory M Peterson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard Marshall; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-23

10.  Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care.

Authors:  William M Tierney; J Marc Overhage; Michael D Murray; Lisa E Harris; Xiao-Hua Zhou; George J Eckert; Faye E Smith; Nancy Nienaber; Clement J McDonald; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.