OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of clinician-targeted computer-generated reminders on compliance with HIV care guidelines in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: We conducted this randomized, controlled trial in an HIV referral clinic in Kenya caring for HIV-infected and HIV-exposed children (<14 years of age). For children randomly assigned to the intervention group, printed patient summaries containing computer-generated patient-specific reminders for overdue care recommendations were provided to the clinician at the time of the child's clinic visit. For children in the control group, clinicians received the summaries, but no computer-generated reminders. We compared differences between the intervention and control groups in completion of overdue tasks, including HIV testing, laboratory monitoring, initiating antiretroviral therapy, and making referrals. RESULTS: During the 5-month study period, 1611 patients (49% female, 70% HIV-infected) were eligible to receive at least 1 computer-generated reminder (ie, had an overdue clinical task). We observed a fourfold increase in the completion of overdue clinical tasks when reminders were availed to providers over the course of the study (68% intervention vs 18% control, P < .001). Orders also occurred earlier for the intervention group (77 days, SD 2.4 days) compared with the control group (104 days, SD 1.2 days) (P < .001). Response rates to reminders varied significantly by type of reminder and between clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: Clinician-targeted, computer-generated clinical reminders are associated with a significant increase in completion of overdue clinical tasks for HIV-infected and exposed children in a resource-limited setting.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of clinician-targeted computer-generated reminders on compliance with HIV care guidelines in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: We conducted this randomized, controlled trial in an HIV referral clinic in Kenya caring for HIV-infected and HIV-exposed children (<14 years of age). For children randomly assigned to the intervention group, printed patient summaries containing computer-generated patient-specific reminders for overdue care recommendations were provided to the clinician at the time of the child's clinic visit. For children in the control group, clinicians received the summaries, but no computer-generated reminders. We compared differences between the intervention and control groups in completion of overdue tasks, including HIV testing, laboratory monitoring, initiating antiretroviral therapy, and making referrals. RESULTS: During the 5-month study period, 1611 patients (49% female, 70% HIV-infected) were eligible to receive at least 1 computer-generated reminder (ie, had an overdue clinical task). We observed a fourfold increase in the completion of overdue clinical tasks when reminders were availed to providers over the course of the study (68% intervention vs 18% control, P < .001). Orders also occurred earlier for the intervention group (77 days, SD 2.4 days) compared with the control group (104 days, SD 1.2 days) (P < .001). Response rates to reminders varied significantly by type of reminder and between clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: Clinician-targeted, computer-generated clinical reminders are associated with a significant increase in completion of overdue clinical tasks for HIV-infected and exposed children in a resource-limited setting.
Authors: Sheraz F Noormohammad; Burke W Mamlin; Paul G Biondich; Brian McKown; Sylvester N Kimaiyo; Martin C Were Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Avy Violari; Mark F Cotton; Diana M Gibb; Abdel G Babiker; Jan Steyn; Shabir A Madhi; Patrick Jean-Philippe; James A McIntyre Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Safran; D M Rind; R B Davis; D Ives; D Z Sands; J Currier; W V Slack; H J Makadon; D J Cotton Journal: Lancet Date: 1995-08-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Nathan M Souza; Rolf J Sebaldt; Jean A Mackay; Jeanette C Prorok; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Nancy Puttkammer; Jane M Simoni; Tracy Sandifer; Jean Marcxime Chéry; Witson Dervis; Jean Gabriel Balan; Jean Geto Dubé; Guirlaine Calixte; Ermane Robin; Kesner François; Cameron Casey; Ira Wilson; Jean Guy Honoré Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2020-12
Authors: Denise Anthony; Andrew T Campbell; Thomas Candon; Andrew Gettinger; David Kotz; Lisa A Marsch; Andrés Molina-Markham; Karen Page; Sean W Smith; Carl A Gunter; M Eric Johnson Journal: IEEE Secur Priv Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: William M Tierney; John E Sidle; Lameck O Diero; Allan Sudoi; Jepchirchir Kiplagat; Stephen Macharia; Changyu Shen; Ada Yeung; Martin C Were; James E Slaven; Kara Wools-Kaloustian Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-08-09 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Tom Oluoch; Abraham Katana; Daniel Kwaro; Xenophon Santas; Patrick Langat; Samuel Mwalili; Kimeu Muthusi; Nicky Okeyo; James K Ojwang; Ronald Cornet; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Nicolette de Keizer Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Eric P Green; Caricia Catalani; Lameck Diero; E Jane Carter; Adrian Gardner; Charity Ndwiga; Aggrey Keny; Philip Owiti; Dennis Israelski; Paul Biondich Journal: Trials Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Shefali Oza; Darius Jazayeri; Jonathan M Teich; Ellen Ball; Patricia Alexandra Nankubuge; Job Rwebembera; Kevin Wing; Alieu Amara Sesay; Andrew S Kanter; Glauber D Ramos; David Walton; Rachael Cummings; Francesco Checchi; Hamish S Fraser Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Caricia Catalani; Eric Green; Philip Owiti; Aggrey Keny; Lameck Diero; Ada Yeung; Dennis Israelski; Paul Biondich Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bisola Ojikutu; Molly Higgins-Biddle; Dana Greeson; Benjamin R Phelps; Anouk Amzel; Emeka Okechukwu; Usman Kolapo; Howard Cabral; Ellen Cooper; Lisa R Hirschhorn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 3.240