Literature DB >> 8868280

Consequences of covert orienting to non-informative stimuli of different modalities: a unitary mechanism?

G Tassinari1, D Campara.   

Abstract

Reaction time (RT) to visual targets is lengthened following non-informative cues presented in the same location, or in different locations but in the same hemifield as the targets. RT lengthening is best accounted for by the voluntary suppression of an overt orienting toward the location of the cue: this veto produces an inhibition of the overall motor reactivity towards stimuli presented in the entire hemifield of the cue. This paper shows that ipsilateral inhibition is not unique to the visual system, since the same directional constraints in motor readiness are induced with somatosensory stimulation. RT is slower when a somatic target delivered on a shoulder is preceded by an ipsilateral somatic cue compared to a contralateral one. The neural control of these orienting tendencies may involve the superior colliculus, which contains overlapping maps of the visual, somatosensory and auditory peripheries. This suggestion is reinforced by the presence of cross-modal inhibitory effects in paradigms involving visual cues and somatic targets or somatic cues and visual targets. While the time course of ipsilateral inhibition is similar in the visual and the somatic modalities, cross-modal inhibitory effects are different and somehow complementary when visual cues precede somatic targets (early short-lasting inhibition) or, respectively, somatic cues precede visual targets (late, long-lasting inhibition). An additional finding is that crossed-uncrossed RT differences (CUDs), presumably due to the anatomical relations between stimulus and response, are present in both modalities.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8868280     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00085-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  13 in total

1.  Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Giovanni Galfano; Bruce Bridgeman; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Inhibition of return in microsaccades.

Authors:  Giovanni Galfano; Elena Betta; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows.

Authors:  Giovanni Galfano; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Daniel Sanabria; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Objects do not aid inhibition of return in crossing the vertical meridian.

Authors:  Ulrich W Weger; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-11-18

6.  Directing visual attention with spatially informative and spatially noninformative tactile cues.

Authors:  Chanon M Jones; Rob Gray; Charles Spence; Hong Z Tan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Cross-modal links in spatial attention.

Authors:  J Driver; C Spence
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective attention in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Kristjana Hysaj; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  When pros become cons for anti- versus prosaccades: factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Myriam W G Vandenbroucke; Jon Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Jinglong Wu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.