Literature DB >> 8858313

Neoplasia distal to the splenic flexure in patients with proximal colon cancer.

G T Lemmel1, J H Haseman, D K Rex, E Rahmani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current American Cancer Society recommendations are that persons aged 50 years or older undergo screening flexible sigmoidoscopy every 3 to 5 years. In clinical practice, persons with adenomas at sigmoidoscopy are generally referred for full colonoscopy. However, cancers proximal to the splenic flexure may not be accompanied by neoplasia distal to the splenic flexure.
METHODS: In order to estimate how often screening flexible sigmoidoscopy would be negative in persons with proximal cancer, we retrospectively reviewed 2053 consecutive colorectal cancer cases diagnosed from 1988 to 1994. Seven hundred ninety-nine (38.9%) had tumors proximal to the splenic flexure. We selected 358 study cases based on full colonoscopy performed and the colonoscopy reports available.
RESULTS: Colonoscopy demonstrated distal adenomas in 77 cases (21.5%): 29 (8.1%) had hyperplastic polyps only, 4 (1.1%) had synchronous cancer, and 248 (69.3%) had no distal polyps. In this population, 77.4% of patients with proximal colon cancer had no distal neoplasia. We estimate that 30% of all patients with colorectal cancer would have a negative screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Prospective evaluation of colonoscopic findings in persons with proximal cancers is needed. Ongoing evaluation of colonoscopy as a general screening test is appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8858313     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70125-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  6 in total

1.  Screening for colon cancer.

Authors:  J P Heiken
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

2.  Rectosigmoid findings are not associated with proximal colon cancer: analysis of 6 196 consecutive cases undergoing total colonoscopy.

Authors:  Makoto Okamoto; Takao Kawabe; Yutaka Yamaji; Jun Kato; Tsuneo Ikenoue; Goichi Togo; Haruhiko Yoshida; Yasushi Shiratori; Masao Omata
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (NORCCAP).

Authors:  G Gondal; T Grotmol; B Hofstad; M Bretthauer; T J Eide; G Hoff
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Impact of a family history of colorectal cancer on age at diagnosis, anatomic location, and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Williamson B Strum
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2005

5.  Intraurban influences on physician colorectal cancer screening practices.

Authors:  Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Alfred R Ashford; Rafael Lantigua; Farida Hajiani; Rebeca Franco; Julia E Heck; Donald Gemson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Risk of advanced proximal adenoma and cancer according to rectosigmoid findings in the Korean population.

Authors:  Yong Woo Chung; Dong Soo Han; Yoon Kyung Park; Byoung Kwan Son; Chang Hee Paik; Yong Cheol Jeon; Joo Hyun Sohn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.487

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.