Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Screening for colon cancer.

Literature DB >> 17114066

Screening for colon cancer.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer screening reduces mortality in individuals 50 years and older. Each of the screening tests currently available has advantages and limitations, and there is no consensus as to which test or combination of tests is best. What is clear, however, is that the rates of colorectal cancer screening remain low. This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting colorectal cancer screening in the average risk population and in high risk groups, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the available screening tests, outlines the currently recommended guidelines for screening based on risk category, and discusses new and emerging technologies for colorectal cancer screening. (c) International Cancer Imaging Society.

Entities: Chemical Disease Gene Species

Mesh：

Substances：

Year: 2006 PMID： 17114066 PMCID： PMC1805055 DOI： 10.1102/1470-7330.2006.9026

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Imaging ISSN： 1470-7330 Impact factor: 3.909

109 in total

Review 1. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening: preliminary results of a systematic review of the literature.

Authors: M L Brown; L Fintor
Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 1993 Impact factor: 4.872

2. Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Therapy and prognosis.

Authors: D Jentschura; M Raute; J Winter; T Henkel; M Kraus; B C Manegold
Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 1994-06 Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3. Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.

Authors: D K Rex
Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 10.864

4. Double-contrast barium enema and flexible sigmoidoscopy for routine colonic investigation.

Authors: N T Brewster; D C Grieve; J H Saunders
Journal: Br J Surg Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 6.939

5. Colonoscopic surveillance reduces mortality from colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis.

Authors: P M Choi; F W Nugent; D J Schoetz; M L Silverman; R C Haggitt
Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 22.682

6. Accuracy of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia. A prospective study using Hemoccult and HemoQuant tests.

Authors: D A Ahlquist; H S Wieand; C G Moertel; D B McGill; C L Loprinzi; M J O'Connell; J A Mailliard; J B Gerstner; K Pandya; R D Ellefson
Journal: JAMA Date: 1993-03-10 Impact factor: 56.272

5. The effect of educational intervention based on theory of planned behavior on the improvement of colorectal cancer screening intention among average-risk individuals referring to Asadabad city clinics.

Authors: Mina Maheri; Fatemeh Darabi; Saeede Khalili; Marziyeh Hesari
Journal: J Educ Health Promot Date: 2021-02-27

5 in total

Screening for colon cancer.

Review 1. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening: preliminary results of a systematic review of the literature.

2. Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Therapy and prognosis.

Review 3. Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.

4. Double-contrast barium enema and flexible sigmoidoscopy for routine colonic investigation.

5. Colonoscopic surveillance reduces mortality from colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis.

6. Accuracy of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia. A prospective study using Hemoccult and HemoQuant tests.

7. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

8. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study. Incidence and death from colorectal carcinoma in an adenoma surveillance program.

9. Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications.

10. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

1. Missense mutations in MLH1, MSH2, KRAS, and APC genes in colorectal cancer patients in Malaysia.

2. Diagnosis of rectal cancer by Tissue Resonance Interaction Method.

3. Patient preference and acceptance with sodium phosphate tablet preparation for colonoscopy.

4. Tumor-associated DNA mutation detection in individuals undergoing colonoscopy.

5. The effect of educational intervention based on theory of planned behavior on the improvement of colorectal cancer screening intention among average-risk individuals referring to Asadabad city clinics.