Literature DB >> 18229773

Intraurban influences on physician colorectal cancer screening practices.

Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin1, Alfred R Ashford, Rafael Lantigua, Farida Hajiani, Rebeca Franco, Julia E Heck, Donald Gemson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community social and economic resources influence colorectal (CRC) screening decisions by physicians and patients. The aim of this study is to systematically assess the differences in screening recommendations of primary care physicians within two urban communities that are distinct in socioeconomic characteristics.
METHODS: Two-hundred-sixty-four primary care community (i.e., not hospital-based) physicians were stratified by community. Using self-report questionnaires, we examined primary care physicians' CRC screening practices, knowledge of risk factors and perceived physician and patient barriers to screening, Physicians practicing in upper-socioeconomic status (SES) communities were compared with those of participants practicing in lower SES communities.
RESULTS: Physicians practicing in low-SES urban communities were significantly more likely to screen with fecal occult blood test than were physicians in upper-SES areas. Alternatively, upper-SES physicians were significantly more likely to recommend screening colonoscopy than were lower-SES physicians. The number of physicians (N=11) who screened for CRC using the double-contrast barium enema were few.
CONCLUSIONS: Community-level SES influences physician cancer screening practices. Further understanding of these relationships may guide the development of interventions targeted to specific neighborhoods within urban areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18229773      PMCID: PMC2575938     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  60 in total

1.  Results from CMA's huge 1998 physician survey point to a dispirited profession.

Authors:  P Sullivan; L Buske
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-09-08       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Contribution of smoking to excess mortality in Harlem.

Authors:  M E Northridge; A Morabia; M L Ganz; M T Bassett; D Gemson; H Andrews; C McCord
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Racial and gender variation in use of diagnostic colonic procedures in the Michigan Medicare population.

Authors:  L F McMahon; R A Wolfe; S Huang; P Tedeschi; W Manning; M J Edlund
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Philip Schoenfeld; Brooks Cash; Andrew Flood; Richard Dobhan; John Eastone; Walter Coyle; James W Kikendall; Hyungjin Myra Kim; David G Weiss; Theresa Emory; Arthur Schatzkin; David Lieberman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Patient preferences for colon cancer screening.

Authors:  M Pignone; D Bucholtz; R Harris
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; A Rostom; V Fiset; J Tetroe; V Entwistle; H Llewellyn-Thomas; M Holmes-Rovner; M Barry; J Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

7.  Patient preferences and quality of life associated with colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  J A Dominitz; D Provenzale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States?

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Diane L Manninen; Fred B Dong; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Marion R Nadel; Florence K L Tangka; Noelle-Angelique M Molinari
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Access to medical care for low-income persons: how do communities make a difference?

Authors:  Ronald M Andersen; Hongjian Yu; Roberta Wyn; Pamela L Davidson; E Richard Brown; Stephanie Teleki
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 10.  Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group.

Authors:  T R Levin; F A Farraye; R E Schoen; G Hoff; W Atkin; J H Bond; S Winawer; R W Burt; D A Johnson; L M Kirk; S C Litin; D K Rex
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  7 in total

1.  Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns.

Authors:  Jane M Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Neeraj K Arora; Gigi Yuan; Judith Lee Smith; Sarah C Kobrin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Intraurban mobility and its potential impact on the spread of blood-borne infections among drug injectors in Tijuana, Mexico.

Authors:  Kimberly C Brouwer; Remedios Lozada; John R Weeks; Carlos Magis-Rodríguez; Michelle Firestone; Steffanie A Strathdee
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.164

3.  Physician barriers to population-based, fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening programs for average-risk patients.

Authors:  S McGregor; Robert Hilsden; H Yang
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Physicians' beliefs about effectiveness of cancer screening tests: a national survey of family physicians, general internists, and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Barbara Matthews; Katrina F Trivers; C Holly Andrilla; Denise Lishner; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Roles of Clinician, Patient, and Community Characteristics in the Management of Pediatric Upper Respiratory Tract Infections.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Yaeger; Jonathan L Temte; Lawrence P Hanrahan; P Martinez-Donate
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Equal cancer treatment regardless of education level and family support? A qualitative study of oncologists' decision-making.

Authors:  Nina Cavalli-Björkman; Bengt Glimelius; Peter Strang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Perceived colonoscopy barriers and facilitators among urban African American patients and their medical residents.

Authors:  Dominique G Ruggieri; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Michael J Rovito; Stephanie Ward; Thomas F Gordon; Anuradha Paranjape; Karen Lin; Brian Meyer; Lilitha Parameswaran; Caitlin Wolak; Johnson Britto; Sheryl B Ruzek
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-01-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.