Literature DB >> 8855017

Views of pregnant women on the involvement of general practitioners in maternity care.

L F Smith1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reorganization of maternity services in England following the report Changing childbirth is likely to impinge upon general practitioners' contribution to maternity care. Professionals and managers are increasingly expected to take account of patients' views when reorganizing services. AIM: This study aimed to elicit women's views about the involvement of general practitioners in maternity care and to establish the extent of continuity provided by general practitioners.
METHOD: A prospective cohort postal questionnaire survey was undertaken in the Bath health district to elicit the views of pregnant women about the general practitioner's role in maternity care, the continuity provided, patient satisfaction and the general practitioner-patient relationship. Responses were rated on five-point Likert scales. Women completed questionnaires at 24 and eight weeks before the birth and at two and eight weeks after the birth.
RESULTS: Of 164 women entering the study (28 of whom were booked for home delivery and 136 for hospital delivery), 116 (71%) completed all four survey questionnaires. Of respondents 68% agreed that general practitioners play an important role in routine antenatal care and 53% that they have an important role in normal labour. These opinions appeared to be stable over time. Most women (73%) were cared for throughout their pregnancy by one general practitioner whom they knew well; such continuity was desired by nearly all the women in the study. Approximately three quarters of women were satisfied with the antenatal, postnatal and overall care provided by their general practitioner. Over half of respondents (56%) wished to get to know the doctor who would be present at the birth: the general practitioner was involved in 19 labours (16%), being present at the birth for only nine women. Women delivering at home were significantly more likely to agree with the statement that they knew the doctor present at the birth compared with those women delivering at hospital. Most women (91%) had their final six-week postnatal check with their general practitioner.
CONCLUSION: Most women in this study believed that general practitioners are important in maternity care, providing continuity of antenatal and postnatal care but not of intrapartum care. These beliefs might be an indicator of the future situation in the United Kingdom when more women give birth at home and under non-consultant care. The vocational training and continuing education of general practitioners should accommodate their possible future roles in maternity care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8855017      PMCID: PMC1239539     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  5 in total

1.  Roles, risks, and responsibilities in maternity care: trainees' beliefs and the effects of practice obstetric training.

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-06-20

2.  Training and supervision of obstetric senior house officers.

Authors:  M Ennis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-07

3.  Provision of obstetric care by general practitioners in the south western region of England.

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Perinatal mortality rates in isolated general practitioner maternity units.

Authors:  V Sangala; G Dunster; S Bohin; J P Osborne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-01

5.  Opinions of general practitioners in Nottinghamshire about provision of intrapartum care.

Authors:  D J Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-24
  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Profile of attendance at a maternity hospital emergency room.

Authors:  J Morgan; W Cullen; G Bury; M J Turner
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  The WOMB (Women's views of birth) antenatal satisfaction questionnaire: development, dimensions, internal reliability, and validity.

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  General practitioners' attitudes to the development of midwifery group practices.

Authors:  N Fenwick; M Morgan; C McKenzie; C Wolfe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Predictors of the provision of intrapartum care by general practitioners: five-year cohort study.

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: dimensions, validity, and internal reliability.

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-03

6.  Women's views of the place of confinement.

Authors:  S Fordham
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Postnatal care: development of a psychometric multidimensional satisfaction questionnaire (the WOMBPNSQ) to assess women's views.

Authors:  Lindsay F P Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Developing consumer-led maternity services: a survey of women's views in a local healthcare setting.

Authors:  Margaret J. Emslie; Marion K. Campbell; Kim A. Walker; Susan Robertson; Anne Campbell
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  The views of mothers and GPs about postpartum care in Australian general practice.

Authors:  Wendy Brodribb; Maria Zadoroznyj; Aimée Dane
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.497

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.