Literature DB >> 11281896

Developing consumer-led maternity services: a survey of women's views in a local healthcare setting.

Margaret J. Emslie1, Marion K. Campbell, Kim A. Walker, Susan Robertson, Anne Campbell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper describes a prospective study of women's views and experiences of maternity services. The aim was to examine the way women make choices and decisions about maternity care and the factors which influence decision making, with a view to developing services which best meet the needs of the population. Patient choice issues reviewed included: choice of place of birth, choice of lead professional and choices in labour management. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of women attending maternity booking clinics, within the catchment area of Peterhead Maternity Unit (PMU) in north-east Scotland, were surveyed by means of postal questionnaires at three stages during their contact with maternity services. A subset of women also took part in in-depth interviews.
RESULTS: Not all women were given information about all the available options for place of birth and many women were unclear of the differences between them. Factors influencing choice of place of birth can change, with the medical aspects of maternity care becoming more important as the pregnancy progresses. Women rated the importance of seeing the same staff at antenatal visits highly, but were less concerned with their ability to choose which professional to see. More importance was attached to being able to choose a particular midwife rather than a particular obstetrician. Women's choices with regard to labour management were largely met. Insufficient information, however, was provided about choices in pain relief.
CONCLUSIONS: The survey revealed the importance of locally based research, involving all stakeholders, in developing services which best meet the needs of a population.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 11281896      PMCID: PMC5060106          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00059.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  18 in total

1.  Birth rights.

Authors:  P Troop
Journal:  Health Serv J       Date:  1993-11-11

2.  High hopes.

Authors:  J Waters
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1996 Oct 16-22

3.  Women's views of the place of confinement.

Authors:  S Fordham
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Choice in childbirth.

Authors:  K Smith
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  1995 Apr 12-18

5.  Expectations, experiences and satisfaction with labour.

Authors:  P Slade; S A MacPherson; A Hume; M Maresh
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1993-11

6.  Midwife managed delivery unit: a randomised controlled comparison with consultant led care.

Authors:  V A Hundley; F M Cruickshank; G D Lang; C M Glazener; J M Milne; M Turner; D Blyth; J Mollison; C Donaldson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-26

7.  Women's satisfaction with antenatal care in a changing maternity service.

Authors:  S Williamson; A M Thomson
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.372

8.  Should obstetricians see women with normal pregnancies? A multicentre randomised controlled trial of routine antenatal care by general practitioners and midwives compared with shared care led by obstetricians.

Authors:  J S Tucker; M H Hall; P W Howie; M E Reid; R S Barbour; C D Florey; G M McIlwaine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-02

9.  A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing.

Authors:  J G Thornton; J Hewison; R J Lilford; A Vail
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-28

10.  The experience of labour: a perspective from those receiving care in a midwife-led unit.

Authors:  J M Walker; S Hall; M Thomas
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.372

View more
  4 in total

1.  An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study.

Authors:  Celia Grigg; Sally K Tracy; Rea Daellenbach; Mary Kensington; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups.

Authors:  Lisa Hinton; Carol Dumelow; Rachel Rowe; Jennifer Hollowell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 3.  What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach.

Authors:  Kirstie Coxon; Alison Chisholm; Reem Malouf; Rachel Rowe; Jennifer Hollowell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Women's birth place preferences in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the quantitative literature.

Authors:  Jennifer Hollowell; Yangmei Li; Reem Malouf; James Buchanan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.