Literature DB >> 8037979

Provision of obstetric care by general practitioners in the south western region of England.

L F Smith1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent government reports have suggested changes to the organization of maternity care in the United Kingdom which may well affect the contribution of general practitioners. AIM: This study set out to document the range of obstetric care provided by general practitioners, their perceived competence at various obstetric procedures, and their beliefs about their role in maternity care.
METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent to a random one in four sample of general practitioners in the South Western Regional Health Authority of England.
RESULTS: Of 424 questionnaires sent out, 333 (79%) were returned. Of 303 respondents, 98% provided both antenatal and postnatal care. Of 294 respondents, 45% provided intrapartum care and 27% booked women for home deliveries. Of 117 respondents providing hospital intrapartum care 47% booked 10 or fewer women each year, and most provided little practical intrapartum care. Compared with those providing only antenatal and postnatal care, those who provided intrapartum care believed themselves to be more competent at various obstetric procedures and their perceived competence was significantly correlated to the number of procedures that they performed. Those general practitioners providing intrapartum care made significantly more postnatal visits than those providing only antenatal/postnatal care and were significantly more likely to believe that general practitioners have an important role in labour.
CONCLUSION: Many general practitioners in the south western region of England still provide a choice in maternity care for women, and believe that they have an important role in such care. Further work is required to establish what women and their general practitioners believe the latter contribute to maternity care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8037979      PMCID: PMC1238896     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  8 in total

1.  General practice in Gloucestershire, Avon and Somerset: explaining variations in standards.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Contribution of general practitioners to hospital intrapartum care in maternity units in England and Wales in 1988.

Authors:  L F Smith; D Jewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-05

3.  Roles of midwives and general practitioners in hospital intrapartum care, England and Wales, 1988.

Authors:  L F Smith; D Jewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-07

4.  Maternity services: the consumer's view.

Authors:  A Taylor
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1986-04

Review 5.  The role of emotional factors in obstetric complications: a review.

Authors:  R L McDonald
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1968 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

6.  The "specialty" of general practitioner obstetrics.

Authors:  G N Marsh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-03-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Prediction of pregnancy complications: an application of the biopsychosocial model.

Authors:  G Smilkstein; A Helsper-Lucas; C Ashworth; D Montano; M Pagel
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  General practitioner participation in intranatal care in the northern region in 1983.

Authors:  G N Marsh; H A Cashman; I T Russell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-03-30
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Profile of attendance at a maternity hospital emergency room.

Authors:  J Morgan; W Cullen; G Bury; M J Turner
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Predictors of the provision of intrapartum care by general practitioners: five-year cohort study.

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Should general practitioners have any role in maternity care in the future?

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Women's views of the place of confinement.

Authors:  S Fordham
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Factors associated with the decision of family physicians to provide intrapartum care.

Authors:  L F Smith; J L Reynolds
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Views of pregnant women on the involvement of general practitioners in maternity care.

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.386

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.