Literature DB >> 2282397

Perinatal mortality rates in isolated general practitioner maternity units.

V Sangala1, G Dunster, S Bohin, J P Osborne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the perinatal mortality rate among normally formed, singleton babies with birth weights greater than or equal to 2500 g in Bath health district based on the intended place of delivery at the time of onset of labour or at the time of diagnosis of intrauterine death.
DESIGN: The numbers of live births and stillbirths were collected monthly returns from the maternity units concerned. Deaths of infants aged less than or equal to 1 week were collected in the same returns. The intended place of delivery was confirmed at the monthly perinatal mortality meeting, during which maternal and fetal factors were discussed.
SETTING: A rural health district of 400,000 population where one third of all deliveries occurred in seven isolated general practitioner maternity units, 8% in the integrated general practitioner unit, and the remainder in the consultant unit.
SUBJECTS: All babies of women whose deliveries were booked in the district before the onset of labour or the diagnosis of intrauterine death, excluding twins, babies with lethal congenital malformations, and those less than 2500 g. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome of all deliveries and parity of mothers.
RESULTS: 14,415 Deliveries were analysed. The perinatal mortality rate was 2.8/1000 births in the consultant unit (7950 deliveries), 4.8 in the isolated general practitioner units (5237 deliveries), and zero in the integrated general practitioner unit (1228 deliveries). Perinatal deaths attributable to asphyxia were more common in the isolated general practitioner units (1.5 per 1000) than the consultant unit (0.6 per 1000). The perinatal mortality rate among babies born to nulliparous women was 3.2/1000 births in the consultant unit and 5.7 in the isolated general practitioner units; for those born to multigravid women it was 2.4 and 4.2 respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of delivery was not influenced by parity. Both antenatal and intrapartum care were responsible for the higher perinatal mortality rate in the isolated general practitioner units. The integrated unit, which shared midwifery staff with the consultant unit, seemed to work well. Analysis by intended place of delivery at the time of onset of labour or diagnosis of intrauterine death suggested that the care given in isolated units needs to be improved, perhaps by better training of general practitioners and consultant supervision of antenatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2282397      PMCID: PMC1663666          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.301.6749.418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

1.  Are isolated maternity units run by general practitioners dangerous?

Authors:  G Young
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-03-21

2.  Classifying perinatal death: fetal and neonatal factors.

Authors:  E N Hey; D J Lloyd; J S Wigglesworth
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-12

3.  Classifying perinatal death: an obstetric approach.

Authors:  S K Cole; E N Hey; A M Thomson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-12

4.  Maternity services: the consumer's view.

Authors:  A Taylor
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1986-04

5.  Contribution of isolated general practitioner maternity units.

Authors:  A J Cavenagh; K M Phillips; B Sheridan; E M Williams
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-12

6.  Home births in England and Wales, 1979: perinatal mortality according to intended place of delivery.

Authors:  R Campbell; I M Davies; A Macfarlane; V Beral
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-22

7.  A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M Klein; I Lloyd; C Redman; M Bull; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-02

8.  How safe is general practitioner obstetrics?

Authors:  G W Taylor; W Edgar; B A Taylor; D G Neal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  General practitioner maternity units.

Authors:  R Campbell; A Macfarlane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-10-27

2.  General practitioner maternity units.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-29

3.  Choice and chance in low risk maternity care.

Authors:  R Campbell; A Macfarlane; S Cavenagh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-14

4.  Outcome of planned home births in an inner city practice.

Authors:  C Ford; S Iliffe; O Franklin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-14

5.  General practice and the future of obstetric care.

Authors:  G L Young
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Community obstetric care in West Berkshire.

Authors:  P Street; M J Gannon; E M Holt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-23

7.  Contribution of general practitioners to hospital intrapartum care in maternity units in England and Wales in 1988.

Authors:  L F Smith; D Jewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-05

8.  Relation between size of delivery unit and neonatal death in low risk deliveries: population based study.

Authors:  D Moster; R T Lie; T Markestad
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.747

9.  Views of pregnant women on the involvement of general practitioners in maternity care.

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  The impact on neonatal mortality of shifting childbirth services among levels of hospitals: Taiwan's experience.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Sylvia H Hsu; Li-Kuei Chen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.